Marsalis v. Garrison
Decision Date | 20 June 1894 |
Citation | 27 S.W. 929 |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Parties | MARSALIS v. GARRISON.<SMALL><SUP>1</SUP></SMALL> |
Appeal from district court, Tarrant county; W. D. Harris, Judge.
Action by T. L. Garrison against T. L. Marsalis. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. Reversed.
Chambers & Thomas and Matlock & Peacock, for appellant. A. M. Carter, for appellee.
Statement of the Case, with Conclusions of Fact.
This suit involves the title to certain lots in the town of Sunset, Tex. The record shows that, if this town be in Wise county, the appellee (plaintiff below), is entitled to recover, and that, if it be in Montague county, the appellant (defendant below), is entitled to recover. The issue, therefore, involved, is one of boundary, viz. the true locus of the line dividing Montague county, on the north, from Wise county, on the south.
In solving this issue, it becomes necessary to refer to the several legislative enactments defining the boundaries of Denton, Cooke, Wise, Jack, and Montague counties, the two first named situated, in the order stated, east of Wise and Montague. These enactments are as follows: Act April 11, 1846: "That all that territory included within the county of Fannin, beginning at the S. W. corner of Collin county; thence west 30 miles; thence north 30 miles; thence east 30 miles; thence south 30 miles to the beginning, be, and the same is hereby, created a new county, to be known and called by the name of Denton." Act March 20, 1848: "That all that territory included within the following limits, to-wit: Beginning on Red river, at the northwest corner of Grayson county; thence south to the north line of Denton county; thence west to the northwest corner of Denton county; thence south thirty miles to the southwest corner of said county of Denton; thence west sixty miles; thence north to Red river; thence down said river to the place of beginning, be, and the same is hereby, created a new county, to be known and called Cooke." Act Jan. 24, 1852 ("An act better defining the boundaries of Denton county"): "The boundaries of Denton county shall be as follows: Beginning at the S. W. corner of Collin county as now established; thence north with the west boundary line of said county of Collin to the corner of Grayson county; thence north with the boundary line of the county to the northeast corner of said Denton county as established by the county of Grayson, a distance in all of 29 miles and seven chains (4 pole chains); thence west following the line of Grayson county and passing its southwest corner, in all, 31 miles; thence south to a point due west of the northwest corner of Dallas county as now established by law; thence east to the said corner of Dallas county; thence with the north boundary line of said county of Dallas eastward to the beginning." Act Jan. 23, 1856 ("An act creating the county of Wise"): "Be it enacted," etc., "that the territory embraced within the following limits, to wit: Beginning at the southwest corner of Denton county; thence north with the west boundary line of said county 30 miles; thence west 30 miles; thence south 30 miles; thence east to the place of beginning, shall comprise the county of Wise." Act Aug. 27, 1856 ("An act to create the county of Jack"): "That the territory embraced in the following limits, to wit: Beginning at the southwest corner of the county of Wise; thence west to the southeast corner of Young; thence north 30 miles; thence east to the northwest corner of the county of Wise; thence south to the place of beginning." Act Dec. 24, 1857 (creating the county of Montague): "Be it enacted," etc., "that the territory embraced in the following limits, to wit: Beginning 6 miles west of the northwest corner of Denton county; thence west with the north line of Wise and Jack counties; thence due north to Red river; thence down said river with its meanderings to a point due north of the beginning; thence south to the beginning, be, and the same is hereby, constituted into a county to be known as the county of Montague." Act July 9, 1879 (defining the boundary lines of Montague): "Beginning 6 miles west of the northeast corner of Wise county; thence west with the north line of Wise and Jack counties to a point 4 miles west of the northeast corner of Jack county; thence due north to Red river; thence down said river with its meanders to a point due north of the beginning; thence due south to the place of beginning."
The purported statement of facts inserted in the record seems to have been filed after the adjournment of court. We find no order authorizing such filing, and we, therefore, are required to ignore this paper. Consequently, also, we adopt the conclusions of fact found by the trial court, as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Scaling v. Williams
...by Constitution and statute; nor is a city estopped to deny an unauthorized contract. See Saunders v. Hart, 57 Tex. 8; Marsalis v. Garrison (Tex. Civ. App.) 27 S. W. 929; Cameron v. State (Tex. Civ. App.) 67 S. W. 348; Galveston Ry. Co. v. State (Tex. Civ. App.) 36 S. W. 111; Grimes County ......
-
Nueces County v. Gussett
...case of Saunders v. Hart, 57 Tex. 8, it was held that the doctrine of estoppel does not ordinarily apply to the state, and in Marsalis v. Garrison, 27 S. W. 929, it was held, after adverting to the ruling as to the "It would follow, therefore, that such a principle could not be applied to a......
-
Board of County Commissioners of Crook County v. Board of County Commissioners of Sheridan County
...with the north line of Wise and Jack Counties." (Tex. Rev. Stat. 1879, p. 143.) The court referred to the decision in the case of Marsalis v. Garrison, supra, the effect that an ex parte survey by one county would not bind the adjoining county, and then answering the contention that the pro......
-
Lancaster v. Gray County
...to the government; that the doctrine is one of public policy. The same rule of law was accepted and announced in Marsalis v. Garrison, Tex. Civ.App., 27 S.W. 929; an exception to the rule is announced by the Commission of Appeals in McKinney v. Freestone County, 291 S.W. 529, in respect to ......