Marsh v. Marsh
Decision Date | 18 October 1912 |
Docket Number | 16,891 |
Citation | 137 N.W. 1122,92 Neb. 189 |
Parties | FLORA M. MARSH ET AL., APPELLEES, v. EDITH V. MARSH ET AL., APPELLANTS |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
APPEAL from the district court for Douglas county: ALEXANDER C TROUP, JUDGE. Reversed with directions.
REVERSED.
Francis A. Brogan, for appellants.
T. J Mahoney, H. C. Brome and William J. Coad, contra.
SEDGWICK J. FAWCETT, J., took no part. LETTON, J., concurring.
William W. Marsh of Omaha died April 2, 1901, leaving an estate of about $ 625,000. He left a widow, Flora M. Marsh, and four sons, Charles, Frank, William, and Allan A. Marsh. Charles Marsh died in 1909. The defendant Edith V. Marsh is his widow, and the defendant Gertrude J. Marsh is their minor daughter. About a year before his death William W. Marsh executed a will, in which he appointed his widow and his four sons trustees of his estate, with large powers and discretion in the control and management thereof. The will was duly probated, and the trustees named assumed the trust and took control of and administered the estate. The plaintiffs Flora M. Marsh, Frank Marsh, William Marsh, and Allan A. Marsh, as trustees under the will, brought this action in the district court for Douglas county to obtain a construction of the will. Charles Marsh, at the time of his death, was indebted to the defendant the United States National Bank of Omaha upon several promissory notes, and the bank answered in the action, and alleged that to secure this indebtedness Charles Marsh had assigned to the bank his interest in the estate of his father, and that the defendant Edith V. Marsh had joined in the assignment, and the bank asked that the administratrix of the estate of Charles Marsh be required to pay the claim of the bank out of the estate of Charles Marsh. Edith V. Marsh contested the right of the bank under the assignment, and contended that, as Charles died before January 1, 1910, he had no interest to assign, and that her assignment was void because of her coverture, and because her interest was contingent and not assignable.
The will contained the following provisions:
It is said in the briefs that three principal questions are presented: First, would the bequest to Charles Marsh vest in him an estate in his lifetime and subject to his debts, or was his interest under the will contingent upon his living until the 1st day of January, 1910? Second, if the estate was contingent and, he having died before that time, was not subject to his debts, who took the estate under the terms of the will, his wife and child as his heirs, or the administrator of the estate as his legal representative? Third, if his widow and child took the estate as his heirs, did the interest of the widow, Edith V. Marsh, go to the bank under the assignment which she executed?
The trial court held, under the first proposition, that the estate of Charles Marsh was a contingent one, and, under the second proposition, that under the terms of the will it went to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
John Fletcher College v. Estate of Maggie Pailing
... ... 529, 76 N.W ... 1062; Farmers' Bank v. Boyd, 67 Neb. 497, 93 ... N.W. 676; Northwall Co. v. Osgood, 80 Neb. 764, 115 ... N.W. 308; Marsh v. Marsh, 92 Neb. 189, 137 N.W ... Whether ... a contract of a married woman was made with [121 Neb. 849] ... the intent on ... ...
-
Ward v. Hislop
...contract." Kocher v. Cornell, 59 Neb. 315, 80 N.W. 911. See Grand Island Banking Co. v. Wright, 53 Neb. 574, 74 N.W. 82; Marsh v. Marsh, 92 Neb. 189, 137 N.W. 1122; Giltner State Bank v. Talich, 115 Neb. 236, 212 536. However, since that question was not raised or discussed in the briefs or......
-
In re Hart's Estate
... ... plain provisions of the will to effectuate the testator's ... intent. In re Estate of Buerstetta, 83 Neb. 287, 119 ... N.W. 469; Marsh v. Marsh, 92 Neb. 189, 137 N.W ... 1122.It is by the application of these rules of construction ... to the whole will that we arrive at the true ... ...