Marshall v. Marshall
| Decision Date | 06 February 1914 |
| Citation | 91 A. 1067,122 Md. 694 |
| Parties | MARSHALL v. MARSHALL. |
| Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court of Baltimore City.
Action by Thomas W. Marshall against Laura Marshall for divorce.
Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
Reversed.
Argued before BOYD, C.J., and BRISCOE, BURKE, THOMAS, PATTISON, URNER, STOCKBRIDGE, and CONSTABLE, JJ.
William Colton, of Baltimore, for appellant. William A. Wheatley, of Baltimore, for appellee.
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
Roeder v. Roeder
...65 A.L.R. 165. See, also, Dicus v. Dicus, 131 Md. 87, 88, 101 A. 697; Owings v. Owings, 148 Md. 124, 137, 128 A. 748; Marshall v. Marshall, 122 Md. 694, 91 A. 1067; Oertel v. Oertel, 145 Md. 177, 125 A. Engelberth v. Engelberth, 159 Md. 700, 150 A. 271; Appel v. Appel, 162 Md. 5, 158 A. 65;......
-
Thiess v. Thiess
...between the parties. Jones on Evidence, § 195; 14 Cyc. 681 and 684, and cases there cited. The language of Judge Stockbridge in Marshall v. Marshall, in 122 Md., is alpplicable in this case. Certain it that the proof adduced by the plaintiff in support of her charges falls far short of what......
-
Dicus v. Dicus
... ... proof is requisite. Code, art. 35, § 4; Tomkey v ... Tomkey, 130 Md. 292, 100 A. 283; Marshall v ... Marshall, 122 Md. 694, 91 A. 1067; Twigg v ... Twigg, 107 Md. 677, 69 A. 517. The allegation of cruelty ... therefore is not sufficiently ... ...
-
Crane v. Crane
...v. Shufeldt, 86 Md. 529, 39 A. 416; Rasch v. Rasch, 105 Md. 504, 66 A. 499; Robins v. Robins, 121 Md. 695, 89 A. 1135; Marshall v. Marshall, 122 Md. 694, 91 A. 1067; Thiess v. Thiess, 124 Md. 296, 92 A. The proof in the case at bar is voluminous, and, as usual in such cases, a large part of......
Request a trial to view additional results