Marti-Matter Co. v. Thomas
Decision Date | 05 December 1921 |
Docket Number | 9897. |
Citation | 202 P. 703,70 Colo. 478 |
Parties | MARTI-MATTER CO. v. THOMAS et al. |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Error to District Court, Kit Carson County; Arthur Cornforth Judge.
Action by the Marti-Matter Company against Herbert J. Thomas and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
Reversed and cause remanded.
Godsman & Godsman, of Burlington, for plaintiff in error.
Louis Vogt, of Burlington, for defendant in error.
The Marti-Matter Company brought this action for damages because of failure of defendants to carry out an alleged contract for the sale to it of four quarter sections of land. Trial was to the court and findings with decree for defendants. Plaintiff brings the record here for review.
The question is whether the letters and telegrams which passed during the negotiations, constitute a binding contract between the parties. From the record it appears that the correspondence began in December, 1917, when the company requested a price on certain tracts owned by defendants. Prices were given and negotiations and sale followed as to one quarter. This sale does not enter into the present consideration, except as it may throw light upon the probable attitude of the parties in dealing with the other land. After the deal was closed on the one quarter, correspondence began as to four other quarters which defendants offered at this time at the price of eleven dollars an acre. Following offers and counter offers between the parties, defendant H. J Thomas finally sent to the company the following telegram:
The company answered as follows:
The letter referred to contained directions for the conveyance of the land and stipulations as to manner and terms of payment, as follows:
In reply to this telegram and letter defendant H. J. Thomas sent a letter to this effect:
Before receipt of the above letter the company sent the following letter and telegram to defendant H. H. Thomas:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ellis Canning Company v. Bernstein
...there has been a meeting of the minds is a question of fact to be determined from all of the evidence in the case, Marti-Matter Co. v. Thomas (1921) 70 Colo. 478, 202 P. 703, but, as was said in Barrett v. Book Cliff Railroad Company (1921) 70 Colo. 440, 201 P. ". . . it is well settled tha......
-
Buckles Mgmt., LLC v. InvestorDigs, LLC
...Inc., 713 P.2d 882, 887 (Colo.1986)); see also Ellis Canning Co. v. Bernstein, supra, 348 F.Supp. at 1221 ( citing Marti-Matter Co. v. Thomas, 70 Colo. 478, 202 P. 703 (1921)) (whether there has been a meeting of the minds is a question of fact to be determined from all of the evidence in t......
-
Complete Entm't Res., LLC v. Jay Bianchi, , Little Prince, LLC
...1145, 1150 (D. Colo. 2010); Ellis Canning Co. v. Bernstein, 348 F.Supp. 1212, 1221 (D. Colo. 1972) (citing Marti-Matter Co. v. Thomas, 70 Colo. 478, 202 P. 703 (1921)) (whether there has been a meeting of the minds is a question of fact to be determined from all of the evidence in the case)......
-
Pierce v. Marland Oil Co. of Colorado
... ... We have held, ... and the rule is still extant, that a completed contract may ... be so evidenced. Marti-Matter Co. v. Thomas, 70 Colo. 478, ... 202 P. 703; Carlsen v. Hay, 69 Colo. 485, 195 P. 103; Barrett ... v. Book Cliff R. Co., 70 Colo. 441, 201 P. 1026 ... ...