Martin v. Estes
| Decision Date | 05 February 1896 |
| Citation | 34 S.W. 53,132 Mo. 402 |
| Parties | Martin et al. v. Estes, Appellant |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Original Opinion of November 12, 1894. Reported at: 132 Mo. 402.
Affirmed.
In pursuance of the foregoing opinion of Barclay, J., as modified, delivered in Division No. 1, which is adopted as the opinion of the Court in Banc, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. But in so doing the judgment is not to be taken as an adjudication upon any rights Mr. Estes may have, growing out of the relation of mortgagee to the property as it existed before the attempt to transfer Mr. Wells' equity by the deed thereby canceled.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ebert v. Myers
...Natl. Bank v. Woelz, 193 S.W. 617; Donovan v. Dunning, 69 Mo. 442; Roberts v. Barnes, 127 Mo. 416; Bank v. Powers, 134 Mo. 446; Martin v. Estes, 132 Mo. 402; 27 C.J. 598, sec. 343; Dry Goods Co. v. McLaughlin Co., 78 Mo. App. 585; King v. Moon, 42 Mo. 554; 27 C.J. 602, sec. 345. (3) The all......
-
Ebert v. Myers
...Natl. Bank v. Woelz, 193 S.W. 617; Donovan v. Dunning, 69 Mo. 442; Roberts v. Barnes, 127 Mo. 416; Bank v. Powers, 134 Mo. 446; Martin v. Estes, 132 Mo. 402; 27 C. J. sec. 343; Dry Goods Co. v. McLaughlin Co., 78 Mo.App. 585; King v. Moon, 42 Mo. 554; 27 C. J. 602, sec. 345. (3) The alleged......