Martin v. Commonwealth
Decision Date | 18 December 1917 |
Parties | MARTIN v. COMMONWEALTH. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Spencer County.
Ashton Martin was convicted, and appeals. Affirmed.
Willis Todd & Bond, of Shelbyville, for appellant.
Charles H. Morris, Atty. Gen., and D. O. Myatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the Commonwealth.
The appellant, Ashton Martin, who is shown by uncontradicted evidence to be a man of bad character, was found guilty under an indictment charging him with the murder of Frank Dulin and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for 10 years. On this appeal it is urged as grounds for reversal: (1) That the verdict of the jury was flagrantly against the evidence; (2) that the deputy sheriff in charge of the jury was guilty of misconduct; and (3) that the jury, or at least some of them, were guilty of misconduct.
The evidence shows substantially the following facts: The sheriff of Spencer county had warrants for the arrest of one Tom Snider and Minor Martin, a brother of Ashton Martin, who were charged with shooting the father-in-law of Minor Martin. Under these warrants the sheriff arrested Snider, and it further appears that after this he or some of his deputies attempted on one or more occasions to find Minor Martin, but did not do so.
After the warrant for the arrest of Minor Martin had been in the hands of the sheriff for some time, he gave it to Frank Dulin, one of his deputies, to execute, and when Dulin went to the house of Martin to arrest him, he found Martin at home, who, when he discovered Dulin, ran out of the house and after going a short distance fell and Dulin caught him, but before he took him in custody Dulin fired one shot from his pistol while Martin was running. After arresting Martin, and while he had him in custody and was on his way with him to a public road, the appellant, Ashton Martin, who says that he was out squirrel hunting on this very dry day soon after dinner, appeared upon the scene.
Ashton Martin tells what then happened in this way:
?
Minor Martin describes the tragedy as follows:
The evidence of these witnesses is substantially corroborated by Gilbert Martin, a brother, and Mrs. Snider, an aunt of ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fry v. Commonwealth
...in many cases. See Marcum v. Commonwealth, 223 Ky. 831, 4 S.W. (2d) 728; Ferrell v. Commonwealth (Ky.) 127 S.W. 162; Martin v. Commonwealth, 178 Ky. 439, 198 S.W. 1158; Peay v. Commonwealth, 181 Ky. 396, 205 S.W. 404; Slaton v. Commonwealth, 193 Ky. 449, 236 S.W. 952; Smith v. Commonwealth,......
-
Williams v. Commonwealth
...131 S.W. 782; Gordon v. Commonwealth, 136 Ky. 508, 124 S.W. 806; Ockerman v. Commonwealth, 176 Ky. 753, 197 S.W. 385; Martin v. Commonwealth, 178 Ky. 439, 198 S.W. 1158; Davis v. Commonwealth, 154 Ky. 774, 159 S.W. Peay v. Commonwealth, 181 Ky. 396, 205 S.W. 404; Hall v. Commonwealth, supra......
-
Fry v. Com.
... 82 S.W.2d 431 259 Ky. 337 FRY v. COMMONWEALTH. Court of Appeals of Kentucky May 14, 1935 ... Appeal ... from Circuit Court, Logan County ... Elmer ... cases. See Marcum v. Commonwealth, 223 Ky. 831, 4 ... S.W.2d 728; Ferrell v. Commonwealth (Ky.) 127 S.W ... 162; Martin v. Commonwealth, 178 Ky. 439, 198 S.W ... 1158; Peay v. Commonwealth, 181 Ky. 396, 205 S.W ... 404; Slaton v. Commonwealth, 193 Ky. 449, 236 ... ...
-
Day v. Commonwealth
...will be ordered. May v. Commonwealth, 164 Ky. 109; Allen v. Commonwealth, 176 Ky. 475; Ockerman v. Commonwealth, 176 Ky. 753; Martin v. Commonwealth, 178 Ky. 439; Peay v. Commonwealth, 181 Ky. 396; Miller v. Commonwealth, 182 Ky. 438; Williams v. Commonwealth, 182 Ky. 711; Cloninger v. Comm......