Martin v. Hausman

Decision Date01 January 1882
PartiesMARTIN and others v. HAUSMAN and others.
CourtU.S. District Court — Western District of Missouri

Botsford & Williams and Henry Wellman, for plaintiffs.

Tichenor Warner & Dean, for defendants.

KREKEL D.J.

This action was commenced in the circuit court of Jackson county Missouri, and removed by the complainants to this court. The bill alleges that plaintiffs are creditors of Stiefel & Ney that the latter were engaged in business at Kansas City Missouri, prior to August 2, 1882, as wholesale dealers in liquors and cigars; and that on the date above set forth they executed to the defendant Hausman a certain deed of trust which is called 'a deed of assignment,' and is in the following language:

'This deed, made and entered into this first day of August, 1881, by and between Edward Stiefel, Solomon Stiefel, and Isaac Ney, constituting the firm of Stiefel & Ney, of Kansas City, Missouri, party of the first part, and Gustave Hausman, party of the second part, and the Anheuser-Busch Brewing Association, and the Bank of Kansas City, Missouri, parties of the third part, witnesseth, that the said parties of the first part, in consideration of the debt and trust hereinafter mentioned and created, and of the sum of one dollar to them in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, do by these presents sell, assign, transfer, and set over to the said party of the second part the following-described personal property, in the county of Jackson and state of Missouri, to-wit: The entire stock of liquors, cigars, and tobacco in the store of the grantors herein, at Nos. 602 and 604 Delaware street, in Kansas City, together with the fixtures, safe, desks, chairs, furniture, stoves, horses, wagons, and each and every thing now used in and about the store aforesaid where the said Stiefel & Ney have been carrying on the business of wholesale liquor dealers, intending hereby to embrace the entire stock of said business, with everything used in connection therewith: To have and to hold the same, with the appurtenances, to the said party of the second part, in trust, however, for the following purposes: Whereas, the said Stiefel & Ney, as such wholesale liquor dealers, have bought goods from time to time from the Anheuser-Busch Brewing Company, and are now indebted to them in the sum of thirty-two thousand seven hundred and twenty seven 85-100 dollars, twelve thousand eight hundred and forty-one dollars, ($12,841,) and which consists of two notes, each for the sum of $5,000, and due, one on August 8, 1881, and the other on August 11, 1881; and the balance of said indebtedness consists of an overdraft of $2,841 due on demand; the said indebtedness to said Anheuser-Busch Brewing Company consists of 20 notes and the balance in open account: Now, to secure the payment of said indebtedness to said Anheuser-Busch Brewing Company and to said Bank of Kansas City, this deed is made, and the property herein assigned, transferred, and sold is this day delivered into possession of the said party of the second part, and he, the said party of the second part, shall hold the same for the purpose herein provided. The said party of the second part shall keep the said property fully insured, and shall proceed at once to realize from said property at either public or private sale, for cash, keeping an accurate account of all goods so sold, and the amount realized therefrom, as well as all expenses incurred in and about taking care of and selling said property; and out of the proceeds of such sales he shall pay, first, the costs and expenses, and the balance shall be applied pro rata upon the said indebtedness, as it shall mature, until the whole shall be paid; and when such has been fully paid, then this deed shall be released at the cost of said parties of the first part. Said party of the second part shall not sell said goods at private sale for less than their market values, and if sold at public sale, 20 days' notice thereof shall first be given, by advertisement, in two of the daily papers published in Kansas City, Missouri, and within four months from this date, at either private or public sale, said property shall be disposed of, or so much thereof as may be necessary to pay off the said debts hereby secured, with interest and costs.
'Witness our hands and seals, the day and date written.
'EDWARD STIEFEL. (Seal.) 'SOLOMON STIEFEL. (Seal.) 'ISAAC NEY. (Seal.)'

This deed was acknowledged and recorded on the day of its execution in the office of the recorder of deeds of Jackson county, Missouri. It further appears from the recitals in the bill that Hausman immediately took possession of the stock in trade and other property conveyed to him by said deed, and that the value thereof was, at the date of the execution of the deed, $75,000. It is alleged therein that said conveyance is an assignment for the benefit of all the creditors of said Stiefel & Ney, and that said Hausman has refused to recognize it as such an instrument, and failed to perform any of the statutory duties imposed upon him as assignee in cases of assignment for the benefit of creditors. It is also stated in the bill that he has refused to recognize the rights of any of the other creditors of Stiefel & Ney, but that, after selling the property described in the deed, he has paid in full the indebtedness due to the Bank of Kansas City and the Anheuser-Busch Brewing Association; that after paying these two creditors in full there is still left the sum of $10,000, which he retains for his costs, charges, and compensation as trustee; that said trustee has always, from the time of accepting said trust, denied the rights of any of the creditors of Stiefel & Ney, excepting the two named in the deed, to any benefit of said conveyance, or to receive any payment of their debts or claims, or any part thereof, from said trust property or the proceeds thereof, and has neglected and refused to execute said trust as required by the law relating to assignments, or to perform all or any of his duties as trustee thereunder; that he has refused to file an inventory, or to cause the goods and effects conveyed to him to be appraised, or to execute any bond for the faithful discharge of his duties as an assignee, or to fix the time and place for adjusting and allowing demands against the estate of said Stiefel & Ney, as insolvents under the assignment law, or to give any notice thereof, or to adjust and allow any demands against said estate, or to pay any such demands in proportion to the amount of each, or in any manner to execute or perform said trust as in cases of assignments.

It is further alleged that Hausman is insolvent, and has parted with all the property except said sum of $10,000; and said Bank of Kansas City and said Anheuser-Busch Brewing Association refuse to account to the other creditors of Stiefel & Ney for the money they have received from said trustee, or any part thereof; that said Stiefel & Ney are indebted in large sums to creditors unknown to the complainants; and this action is commenced for the benefit of so many of said creditors as may join therein, as well as the complainants themselves. The prayer for relief is that the court declare said deed to be for the benefit of all the creditors of said Stiefel & Ney, in proportion to their respective claims; that Hausman be removed from his trust as trustee, and another trustee appointed, and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
28 cases
  • Calihan v. Powers
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 17 Marzo 1896
    ...of Missouri. In Bank v. Bank, supra, the supreme court of the United States disapproved the doctrine announced by Judge Krekel in Martin v. Hausman, 14 F. 160, and a long line cases which followed it, to the effect that a debtor in Missouri in failing circumstances might prefer one or more ......
  • Jaffrey v. Mathews
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 19 Febrero 1894
    ... ... correctness of this construction seems to have been ... originated by an opinion of Judge Krekel in Martin v ... Hausman, 14 F. 160, who undertook to lay down the law to ... be that while "a debtor in Missouri, under its ... legislation and ... ...
  • Richmond v. Mississippi Mills
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 22 Junio 1889
    ...160; 23 N.W. 646; 15 N.W. 558; 8 Iowa 96; Burrill on Ass., sec. 3; 23 S. C., 405; 31 N.W. 381; 5 A. 523; 19 F. 70; 28 N.W. 380; 14 F. 160; 11 id., 297; 37 Ark. 150; 47 id., 367; 9 S.Ct. If assignments they are void, because no bond was filed, and the sale was to be made contrary to law. 39 ......
  • Dyson v. St. Paul National Bank
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • 5 Diciembre 1898
    ... ... by the instrument providing for a trust to the assignee in ... the unemployed balance or surplus. Crow v ... Beardsley, 68 Mo. 435; Martin v. Hausman, 14 F ... 160; Clapp v. Dittman, 21 F. 15; Weber v. Mick, 131 ... Ill. 520 ...          Both ... under the Minnesota and ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT