Martin v. Little Rock & Ft. S. Ry. Co.
Decision Date | 07 March 1896 |
Citation | 34 S.W. 545 |
Parties | MARTIN v. LITTLE ROCK & FT. S. RY. CO. et al. |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Johnson county; Jeremiah G. Wallace, Judge.
Action by Robert S. Martin against the Little Rock & Ft. Smith Railway Company for personal injuries From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Action by Robert S. Martin against the railway company for injuries received by him while about to cross its track. He alleged that the injuries were occasioned by the negligence of the employés in charge of train of defendant company. The railway company denied negligence, and alleged that the injury of plaintiff was caused by his own carelessness. The plaintiff, to sustain his case, testified as follows: This was all the testimony of plaintiff except that portion describing his injuries. Other witnesses testified that plaintiff was in the act of stepping upon the railway track when hit by the engine. The train was approaching in full view, and, had plaintiff looked to the west, he could have seen it for at least 200 yards before it reached him. Under these facts the court directed a verdict for defendant, and plaintiff appealed.
A. S. McKennon, for appellant. Dodge & Johnson, for appellee.
RIDDICK, J. (after stating the facts).
We agree with counsel for...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Clark v. Union Pac. R. Co.
... ... necessarily constitute negligence. Martin v ... Little Rock R. R. Co. , 62 Ark. 156 34 S.W. 545; ... Tiffin v. St Louis, ... [257 ... ...
-
Griffie v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.
...of law under such circumstances. Railway v. Crabtree (Ark.) 62 S. W. 64; Railway v. Martin, 61 Ark. 549, 33 S. W. 1070; Railway v. Martin, 62 Ark. 158, 34 S. W. 545; Railway v. Blewitt, 65 Ark. 238, 45 S. W. 548; Railway v. Johnson (Ark.) 86 S. W. 282; Railway v. Baskins (Ark.) 93 S. W. 757......