Martin v. Miller

Citation60 So. 772,103 Miss. 754
Decision Date17 February 1913
Docket Number15,690
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
PartiesG. M. MARTIN v. S. D. MILLER

APPEAL from the circuit court of Smith county, HON. W. H. HUGHES, Judge.

Action by S.D. Miller against G. M. Martin. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

Reversed and remanded.

Howie & Howie, attorneys for appellant.

Wills & Guthrie, attorneys for appellee.

No brief of counsel on either side found in the record.

OPINION

REED, J.

Appellant, the sheriff of Smith county, levied an execution issued on an enrolled judgment against appellee on certain cotton, the property of appellee. A replevin suit was filed by appellee to recover possession of the cotton. The circuit court gave a peremptory instruction to find for appellee.

It is contended that the judgment upon which the execution was issued is void. We find that the judgment was regular in all respects, reciting all necessary facts, including the proper service of summons upon defendant, to entitle the court to render the judgment. All presumptions of law are in favor of the correctness of judgments. The judgment in this case imports its verity, is conclusive in its character, and we decide cannot be attacked collaterally. Duncan v. McNeill, 31 Miss. 704; Cannon v. Cooper, 39 Miss. 784, 80 Am. Dec. 101; Vicksburg Gro. Co. v. Brennan, 20 So. 845.

Reversed and remanded.

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • City of Greenwood v. Humphrey & Co., Inc
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • May 23, 1938
    ... ... v. Harlan, 87 So. 152 ... On ... collateral attack, every intendment is in favor of the ... judgment ... Martin ... v. Miller, 60 So. 772; 28 U.S.C. A., sec. 71, 80, page 378 ... The ... court could on its own motion have remanded this cause ... ...
  • Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Agnew
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • May 28, 1934
    ... ... 586; Bustamente ... v. Boscher, 43 Miss. 175; Hammond v. Olive, 44 ... Miss. 546; Merritt v. White, 8 Ga. 438; Robinson ... v. Miller, 57 Miss. 238; Eskridge v. Jones, 1 Smedes ... & M. 596; Lea v. Iron Belt Mercantile Co., 8 L. R ... A. (N. S.) 279; National Surety Co. v. Board ... & Co. v. Sandifer, 129 Miss. 167, 91 So. 899; ... Berry v. Dampier, 131 Miss. 893, 95 So. 744; ... Commonwealth Bank v. Martin, 9 Smedes & M. 613; ... Monk v. Horne, 38 Miss. 100; Cannon v ... Cooper, 39 Miss. 784; Miss. Power Co. v ... Russell, 152 So. 847; Gulf & Ship ... ...
  • Lord v. City of Kosciusko
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • April 23, 1934
    ... ... So. 290; Jefferson Davis County v. Lumber Co., 49 ... So. 611, 94 Miss. 530; 44 C. J., Municipal Corporations, ... secs. 3292 and 3293; Martin v. Miller, 103 Miss ... 754, 60 So. 772; Swayne v. Hattiesburg, 111 So. 818, ... 147 Miss. 244; Paepecke-Leight Lbr. Co. v. Savage, ... 137 Miss ... ...
  • Russell v. Federal Land Bank
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • November 1, 1937
    ...26 Miss. 434; Section 2936, Code of 1930; Cotton v. Harlan, 87 So. 152, 124 Miss. 691; Duncan v. Gerdine, 59 Miss. 550; Martin v. Miller, 60 So. 772, 103 Miss. 754; MeIntosh v. Machinery Co., 145 So. 731, 167 546; Quarles v. Hiern, 14 So. 23; Scott County v. Dubois, 130 So. 106, 158 Miss. 2......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT