Martin v. Perma-Chink Sys., Inc.
Decision Date | 27 June 2016 |
Docket Number | No. E2015-01466-COA-R3-CV,E2015-01466-COA-R3-CV |
Parties | PAUL M. MARTIN v. PERMA-CHINK SYSTEMS, INC. |
Court | Tennessee Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County
This appeal arises from an age discrimination lawsuit brought under the Tennessee Human Rights Act ("THRA"). Paul M. Martin ("Martin") sued his former employer Perma-Chink Systems, Inc. ("Perma-Chink") in the Circuit Court for Knox County ("the Trial Court"). Martin alleged that he had been fired as a sales representative for Perma-Chink because of his age, then 60. The matter was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of Martin. Perma-Chink filed an appeal to this Court, and Martin raises his own issues on appeal. Perma-Chink argues, among other things, that the Trial Court erred in admitting a chart ("the Chart") containing raw data of employee ages at their date of termination, and that Martin failed to prove a prima facie case of age discrimination. We, inter alia, affirm the age discrimination judgment for Martin. However, we find error in the calculation of damages for back pay in that Martin's post-termination earnings were not taken into account, and we remand for the Trial Court to enter a remittitur in the amount of $20,219.05. Should Martin refuse this remittitur, Martin may opt for a new trial. We find further that under the THRA Martin is entitled to an award of attorney's fees and litigation expenses incurred on appeal, and we remand for the Trial Court to determine a reasonable award of attorney's fees and litigation expenses for Martin. The judgment of the Trial Court is affirmed as modified.
D. MICHAEL SWINEY, C.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which JOHN W. MCCLARTY and THOMAS R. FRIERSON, II, JJ., joined.
Robert R. Carl and Ashley Meredith Lowe, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Perma-Chink Systems, Inc.
Richard T. Scrugham, Jr., Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Paul M. Martin.
OPINIONIn June 2013, Martin sued Perma-Chink in the Trial Court under the THRA alleging age discrimination in his termination. Perma-Chink is a business that manufactures flexible chinking and preservation products for log homes. Martin was 56 when he was hired by Perma-Chink to be a sales representative. He was 60 when he was fired. Perma-Chink filed an answer in opposition. Perma-Chink also filed a motion for summary judgment, which was denied. This case was tried before a jury in February 2015.
Martin, age 62 at trial, testified. In May 2008, Martin, then age 56, was hired by Perma-Chink as an outside sales representative. Martin had spent decades in sales before taking this new job. Martin described his job at Perma-Chink: Martin originally was assigned a massive territory encompassing Arkansas, Kansas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Texas. In 2009, Tennessee was added to Martin's territory.
Martin testified as to the leadership at Perma-Chink. Rick Webb ("Webb"), then national sales manager, was his direct supervisor. Webb in turn reported to a "management team," consisting of Terry Hofrichter, Tony Huddleston, and Randy Adamson. Huddleston and Martin were based in Knoxville. Adamson and Hofrichter were based in Redmond, Washington. Perma-Chink's owner, Rich Dunstan, was based in Redmond, as well. According to Martin, Adamson actually ran the company, and he was fixated on cutting costs by all means.
Martin described his feelings about his job: Martin testified to his sales style:
Martin testified that he received an "A" rating in 2012 from Webb.
However, problems began to develop for Martin. In August 2012, Perma-Chink instituted a new training program called Sandler for its outside sales staff. The parties at trial and on appeal dispute the degree to which Martin resisted learning the new sales system and whether his effectiveness declined. Martin testified to issues surrounding Sandler, as well as his performance at Perma-Chink around this time, as follows:
Martin acknowledged that his sales declined, but stated that was because of certain factors beyond his control. Martin also denied that he had been uncooperative regarding the new sales system. In mid-2012, Martin began to suffer medical issues, some related to his back. As to Perma-Chink's expressions of concern about his performance, Martin testified:
Martin was fired in December 2012. Webb delivered the news to Martin at a meeting at a McDonald's restaurant. Webb told Martin that the company had decided to go in a different direction. An existing outside sales representative, Paul Peebles, took over Martin's territory. Martin, meanwhile, began to earn additional income from a nut roasting business he had opened while still at Perma-Chink.
Martin testified as to why he believed age was the reason for his termination:
Martin acknowledged that Huddleston, who had hired him and also later had a role in his termination, was older than him.
Adamson, Perma-Chink's corporate controller, testified. The Chart was introduced at this point. The Chart had been prepared by Perma-Chink in response to Martin's interrogatories and was admitted as Exhibit 30. The Chart revealed that during the period Martin worked for Perma-Chink,...
To continue reading
Request your trial