Martin v. State Bd. of Elections, 77-333-M
| Decision Date | 29 December 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 77-333-M,77-333-M |
| Citation | 119 R.I. 556,381 A.2d 234 |
| Parties | James R. MARTIN v. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al. P. |
| Court | Rhode Island Supreme Court |
This is a petition for certiorari to review a decision of the State Board of Elections that affirmed a decision of the City of Central Falls Board of Canvassers and Registration which in turn held that the petitioner was ineligible to be a candidate in a nonpartisan election for the office of school committeeman from the city's Third Ward. The petitioner, a classified employee of the State of Rhode Island, is challenging on First Amendment grounds the constitutionality of G.L.1956 (1969 Reenactment) § 36-4-51, which in its pertinent portion states: "No classified employee * * * shall seek the nomination of or be a candidate for any elective office, other than membership on an unpaid city or town commission * * *."
On September 30, 1977, we issued an order directing the responsible officials to restore petitioner's name to the ballot which was to be used on October 4, 1977, the primary election day. In that primary, petitioner gained a runoff position for the general election which was held on Tuesday, November 8, 1977. Oral arguments on the petition were held on October 19, 1977. Because of the press of time, we were unable to render a full decision in this matter prior to the November 8, 1977 election. Accordingly, we entered an order on October 20, 1977, which protected petitioner's right to appear on the November 8, 1977 ballot. This opinion is an explanation of the action taken at that time.
The issue presently before us actually was resolved in August of this year by our opinion in Cummings v. Godin, R.I., 377 A.2d 1071 (1977). There a schoolteacher employed by the City of Woonsocket challenged a provision in the city's charter which provided that "No person employed by the City * * * shall assume any elective office unless he first resigns his position with the City." The teacher was also a member of the Rhode Island Senate. In the Godin case this court ruled that the right to hold public office is one of the rights that is included within the ambit of the First Amendment. We recognized that while the government has a compelling interest in restricting the political activities of its employees, the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Cincinnati v. Ohio Council 8, American Fedn. of State, Cty. & Mun. Emp., AFL-CIO
...448 F.2d 456; Kinnear v. San Francisco (1964), 61 Cal.2d 341, 38 Cal.Rptr. 631, 392 P.2d 391; Minielly, supra; Martin v. State Bd. of Elections (1977), 119 R.I. 556, 381 A.2d 234. Other courts have upheld them, finding a sufficient interest to warrant the restrictions because support for no......
-
Bauers v. Cornett
...1976); Lecci v. Cahn, 360 F.Supp. 759 (E.D.N.Y.1973) (vacated on other grounds, 493 F.2d 826 (2nd Cir.1974)); Martin v. State Bd. of Elections, 119 R.I. 556, 381 A.2d 234 (1977); Cummings v. Godin, 119 R.I. 325, 377 A.2d 1071 (1977); Phillips v. Flint, 57 Mich.App. 394, 225 N.W.2d 780 (1975......
-
Fangman v. City of Cincinnati, 1:08cv702.
...448 F.2d 456; Kinnear v. San Francisco (1964), 61 Cal.2d 341, 38 Cal.Rptr. 631, 392 P.2d 391; Minielly, supra; Martin v. State Bd. of Elections (1977), 119 R.I. 556, 381 A.2d 234. Other courts have upheld them, finding a sufficient interest to warrant the restrictions because support for no......
-
Advisory From the Governor, In re
...while leaving less qualified persons available for the positions. The Governor, relying on Cummings and Martin v. State Board of Elections, 119 R.I. 556, 381 A.2d 234 (1977), claims that the state has no sufficient interest in barring a public official from succeeding to another state posit......