Martin v. State, 45611
Decision Date | 17 January 1973 |
Docket Number | No. 45611,45611 |
Citation | 489 S.W.2d 282 |
Parties | Tom MARTIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Craig A. Washington, Sr., of Wade, Ramus & Washington, Houston, for appellant.
Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty., James C. Brough and Charles Campbell, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
DALLY, Commissioner.
The conviction is for robbery by assault; the punishment, twenty years imprisonment.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged and the first ground of error complains of the admission into evidence of extraneous offenses.
The complaining witness, Victor Patrick, a supervisor for Dentler Potato Chip Company, testified that he was 'pulling' a delivery route on December 28, 1970, for a salesman who was off work. At approximately 2:00 p.m., he had parked his delivery truck, a 'step-in van,' in front of the Booker T. Grocery Store. Having ascertained the customer's needs, he returned to his truck and as he stepped up inside the van he heard someone behind him. He turned around and saw the appellant with a gun in his hand, with only the barrel visible. The appellant then relieved Patrick of $149.00 in cash and checks. As Patrick reached for his billfold, the appellant told him to keep his hands out of his pockets and to turn around. Patrick turned around and the appellant left. The appellant was wearing blue plaid pants and a blue shirt with small checks. He was quiet and was not nervous during the encounter.
After the State rested, the appellant, testifying in his own behalf, denied that he committed the offense and offered alibi testimony.
In rubuttal, the State offered the testimony of Mitchell James Walters, a Frito Lay route salesman. At approximately 12:45 p.m. on January 13, 1971, while in his delivery truck, a 'step-in van,' parked in front of a grocery store, the appellant approached and said, 'Have you got a light?' Walters said 'No.' The appellant said 'Give me your money.' The appellant pulled a pistol which had been tucked in his belt and took Walters' billfold containing about $220.00 in cash and checks. This testimony had all been elicited before objection was made.
The State then offered the testimony of Charles David Waychesyn, a route salesman for the Frito Lay Company, who was servicing his accounts on Jenson Drive on January 14, 1971. At approximately 3:45 p.m. he was in his van delivery truck which was parked in front of the Wing-Y Grocery Store. A man be identified as the appellant, carrying a revolver which he could only partially see, opened the partly closed door of the van and said, 'Let me have it.' Waychesyn was frightened, jumped and hollered. The appellant stepped back for a moment, then came back and Waychesyn handed the appellant $117.00.
The State then offered the testimony of Barney Bennett, a district sales manager for Frito Lay Company, who on November 5, 1970, was servicing accounts in a vantype route sales truck on Jenson Drive. He had been in the Coleman Supermarket and got back in his van and sat down to write his order when someone said the word 'money.' He looked up and saw a man he identified as the appellant who was holding a gun partially covered by a hat. When told by the witness that he only had some checks and a few one dollar bills, the appellant said, This witness said the appellant had on blue britches and a blue shirt, spoke softly and was not excited.
The appellant's defense of alibi raised the question of his identity as the man who...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Redd v. State, 49097
...(Tex.Cr.App.1973); Curlin v. State, 492 S.W.2d 480 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Fagan v. State, 489 S.W.2d 578 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Martin v. State, 489 S.W.2d 282 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Frison v. State, 473 S.W.2d 479 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); compare Johnson v. State, 509 S.W.2d 870 (Tex.Cr.App.1974).4 See Thru......
-
Henriksen v. State
...and authorized admission of evidence of extraneous offenses for the purpose of showing identity. Fagan v. State, supra; Martin v. State, 489 S.W.2d 282 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Frison v. State, 473 S.W.2d 479 (Tex.Cr.App.1971). A rebuttal witness called by the State testified that some six months......
-
Wilson v. State
...the consideration of evidence of extraneous offenses. See Williams v. State, 508 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); Martin v. State, 489 S.W.2d 282, 283 (Tex.Crim.App.1973). He also admits that in the absence of an objection, the failure to submit an instruction on extraneous offense is not......
-
Fagan v. State, 45640
...offense. Smith v. State, 409 S.W.2d 409 (Tex.Cr.App.1966); Schneider v. State, 392 S.W.2d 130 (Tex.Cr.App.1965); Martin v. State, 489 S.W.2d 282 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Bryant v. State, 471 S.W.2d 66 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Frison v. State, 473 S.W.2d 479 The appellant's two remaining grounds of erro......