Martin v. Wilson

Decision Date13 July 1927
Citation113 So. 713,94 Fla. 207
PartiesKate H. MARTIN, etc., Appellant v. M. D. WILSON et al., Appellees.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court
COUNSEL

Shutts & Bowen and L. S. Julian, all of Miami, for appellant.

W. F. Brown, M. S. Bobst, and Roy S. Wood, all of Miami, for appellees.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The transcript of the record in this case having been examined and considered by the court, it is found that the decree herein should be affirmed, except as to that part of the decree allowing attorney's fees, which should be reversed, and the costs of the appeal should be taxed against the complainant on authority of the opinion in the case of Kate Havlin Martin et al. v. Rothar (Fla.) 113 So. 713, decided at this term of the court; and it is so ordered.

Reversed in part.

WHITFIELD, P.J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, JJ., concur.

ELLIS, C.J., and STRUM and BROWN, JJ., concur in the opinion.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT