Martinez v. Garcia, 90-2531
| Decision Date | 12 March 1991 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-2531,90-2531 |
| Parties | 16 Fla. L. Weekly 667 Anthony MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. Carmen GARCIA, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Kurzban, Kurzban and Weinger and Steven M. Weinger and Martin A. Feingenbaum, Miami, for appellant.
John Elias, Hialeah, for appellee.
Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.
Anthony Martinez appeals the trial court's order denying his exceptions to the report of the general master and approving the report. We affirm.
In a November, 1984 agreement Martinez acknowledged paternity of the child born to appellee Carmen Garcia in 1982, and agreed to pay child support. The agreement was ratified and incorporated into a final judgment of paternity entered in 1985. In 1990 the mother moved to modify the level of child support, alleging a substantial change of circumstances. On motion by the mother, the matter was referred to the general master pursuant to Rule 1.490, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure (1989). After hearing the parties the general master entered an order increasing the child support level. The father filed timely exceptions which were denied by the circuit judge without hearing. The father has appealed.
The father first contends that he did not consent to referral of the matter to the general master pursuant to Rule 1.490(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. As the father made no objection prior to commencement of the hearing before the general master, that objection is waived. Bathurst v. Turner, 533 So.2d 939, 941 n. 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
The father asserts that the child support guidelines are not applicable because the original child support decree was entered in 1985, prior to the July 1, 1987 effective date of the child support guidelines. See ch. 87-95, §§ 3, 25, Laws of Fla. That contention is misplaced. The child support guidelines are expressly applicable "in a proceeding for modification of an existing order for such support, whether the proceeding arises under this or another chapter." § 61.30, Fla.Stat. (1989). The guidelines apply in "[a]ny action ... for modification of child support which is filed on or after the effective date of this act [July 1, 1987]...." Ch. 87-95, § 25, Laws of Fla. As the petition for modification was filed after July 1, 1987, the child support guidelines applied in the modification proceedings. *
The father next contends that the mother's motion for modification did not give adequate notice of the relief sought. While the motion was brief, we conclude that it was adequate under the circumstances.
Finally, the father contends that the trial court was obliged to conduct a hearing on the timely filed exceptions. On that point the father is correct. The Rule so provides. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.490(h); see Monyek v. Monyek, 453 So.2d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Ordinarily we would reverse and remand for the conducting of the hearing. However, on this appeal we have disposed of the legal issues raised by the father. The only remaining contention is that the evidence does not support the general master's findings. The father advances the theory here that the hearing under Rule 1.490(h...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Whight v. Whight
...effective date of the initial child support guideline statute. Pitts v. Pitts, 626 So.2d 278 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Martinez v. Garcia, 575 So.2d 1365 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). The instant appeal, however, involves not a question relating to abuse of discretion, but rather a purely legal question a......
-
Pitts v. Pitts
...guidelines, even though the original child support decree was entered prior to adoption of the support guidelines. Martinez v. Garcia, 575 So.2d 1365, 1366 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). It is reversible error to depart from the child support guidelines without provision of a written finding or a spec......
-
Newberry v. Newberry, 5D02-362.
...date of the child support guidelines. The guidelines are only applicable to petitions filed after that date. Martinez v. Garcia, 575 So.2d 1365 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Thus Hammond is not helpful in analyzing child support issues under the The result in this case is due to the fact that appella......
-
Cazi v. Prophete
...without conducting a hearing where a party filed timely exceptions to the report and requested a hearing); Martinez v. Garcia, 575 So.2d 1365, 1366–67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (holding that the trial court was required to conduct a hearing on timely filed exceptions to general master's order). We......
-
Title procedure before general magistrates and child support enforcement hearing officers.
...v. Smith, 932 So. 2d 638, 639 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 2006); FLA. FAM. L. R. P. 12.490(f); FLA. R. JUV. P. 8.257(f). (66) Martinez v. Garcia, 575 So. 2d 1365, 1367 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1991); but see, e.g., Bellville v. Bellville, 763 So. 2d 1076, 1077 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1999) (de novo hearing on (67) DeC......