Martino v. Barra
Decision Date | 22 June 1967 |
Docket Number | No. 39956,39956 |
Citation | 37 Ill.2d 588,229 N.E.2d 545 |
Parties | Marlene H. MARTINO, Admx., et al. v. Ned Thomas BARRA et al., Appellees. Appeal of CITIES SERVICE OIL COMPANY et al. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
Kirkland, Ellis, Hodson, Chaffetz & Masters, Chicago (Charles M. Rush, and John M. O'Connor, Jr., Chicago, of counsel), for appellant, Cities Service Oil Co.
Hinshaw, Culbertson, Moelmann & Hoban, Chicago (John M. Moelmann, and D. Kendall Griffith, Chicago, of counsel), for appellee, Ned Thomas Barra.
Patrick J. Muldowney, Chicago, for appellee, Mt. Vernon Tire Service Corp.
James A. Dooley, Chicago, for plaintiffs, as amici curiae supporting petition for leave to appeal.
We allowed a petition for leave to appeal by Cities Service Oil Company from a judgment of the First District Appellate Court, which reversed in part a judgment of the circuit court of Cook County, dismissed the appeal as to certain parties, and remanded the cause. (Martino v. Barra, 67 Ill.App.2d 328, 215 N.E.2d 12). We restate here that court's history of the litigation and factual summary:
'Plaintiffs' motion was sustained as to defendants Barra and Mt. Vernon, and a new trial on the question of damages was granted; the motion was denied as to the other defendants. Cross-claimant Halmel's motion was sustained as to Barra and Mt. Vernon, and a new trial on the question of damages was granted. Cross-claimant Cities Service's motion was sustained as to Barra and Mt. Vernon, and judgment entered in the amount of $3,000. It is from these judgments that Ned Thomas Barra and Mt. Vernon Tire Service Corporation bring this appeal. (The appeal to the appellate court.)
automobile struck the tractor-trailer resulting in their deaths.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Apex Mut. Ins. Co. v. Christner
...of the Plaintiff and against the Defendants on the issue of liability.This order, however, is not a final judgment (Martino v. Barra, 37 Ill.2d 588, 229 N.E.2d 545) and is subject to correction or vacation at any time prior to ultimate disposition of the case.3 See Simms v. Andrews, 10 Cir.......
-
EMC Mortg. Corp. v. Kemp
...final.” Crane Paper Stock Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Ry. Co., 63 Ill.2d 61, 66, 344 N.E.2d 461 (1976); see also Martino v. Barra, 37 Ill.2d 588, 594, 229 N.E.2d 545 (1967). The circuit court's October 5 denial of Kemp's emergency motion to vacate is not a final order, nor is the November......
-
Marriage of Lentz, In re
...there was no just reason to delay enforcement or appeal would not be sufficient to confer appellate jurisdiction. Martino v. Barra (1967), 37 Ill.2d 588, 594-95, 229 N.E.2d 545; Davis v. Childers (1965), 33 Ill.2d 297, 300-01, 211 N.E.2d 364; Mayrath Co. v. Industrial Com. (1965), 33 Ill.2d......
-
Weber v. Northern Illinois Gas Co.
...Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co., 22 Ill.App.2d 179, 159 N.E.2d 833; Davis v. Childers, 33 Ill.2d 297, 211 N.E.2d 364; Martino v. Barra, 37 Ill.2d 588, 229 N.E.2d 545; O'Leary v. Siegel, 120 Ill.App.2d 12, 256 N.E.2d In Veach, the Appellate Court refused to accept the trial court's findin......