Marvel v. White
Decision Date | 30 July 1897 |
Citation | 50 P. 87,1897 OK 84,5 Okla. 736 |
Parties | WILLIAM H. MARVEL v. CHARLES WHITE. |
Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
Error from the District Court of Oklahoma County.
Motion to dismiss said cause on the ground that no petition in error has been filed in this court. Considered on said motion to dismiss. Motion sustained.
¶0 1. PRACTICE--Motion to Dismiss-- No Service of--Considered When. A motion to dismiss proceedings in error, which raises a jurisdictional question, will be considered and determined, when the case is reached for final disposition, although the notice thereof required by rule 16 of this court has never been given.
2. PETITION IN ERROR--Requisites of--Dismissal of Cause. An alleged proceeding in error will be dismissed when the instrument claimed to answer the purpose of a petition in error is defective, in not being entitled "Petition in Error," failing to set forth the errors complained of and not containing any of the other essential allegations of such pleading.
Charles H. Eagin and Ransom & Bailey, for plaintiff in error.
Asp, Shartel & Cottingham, for defendant in error.
¶1 While this court declined to consider the motion to dismiss this cause at the time same was filed, viz., January 5, 1897, because no showing of the service of notice thereof was filed, as required by rule 16 of this court, yet, now, when said cause is reached for consideration on its merits, we feel compelled to determine the question raised by said motion, as it is one which questions the jurisdiction of this court. The motion, omitting the caption, is as follows:
¶2 The first page of the record, or papers, filed in this court is the only portion thereof that could possibly have been intended for a petition in error. It reads as follows:
¶3 The next page, (designated as page No. 1 of the case-made), begins as follows:
¶4 Which is followed by a condensed statement of the material proceedings had in said cause in the court below; said statement, occupying all of said page and the first half of the next, then comes the following alleged assignments of error, to- wit:
¶5 The filing marks on said record are on the cover to the case-made and are as follows:
¶6 Our statute declares that "the proceedings to obtain such reversal shall be by petition to be entitled 'petition in error' filed in a court having power to make such reversal, vacation or modification, setting forth the errors complained of; and thereupon a summons shall issue and be served, or publication made, as in the commencement of an action." . And in § 4442 it is further declared "that in all actions hereafter instituted by petition in error in the supreme court the plaintiff in error shall attach to and file with the petition in error the original case-made filed in the court below or a certified transcript of the record of said court."
¶7 Has the plaintiff in...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Zahn v. Obert
- Ward v. Wilson
-
Farmers' State Bank of Granite v. City State Bank of Mangum
...court tried the case, nor the pleadings, it will be dismissed."See, also, Higgins v. Higgins, 7 Kan. App. 811. 52 P. 906; Marvel v. White, 5 Okla. 736, 50 P. 87; Board of Com'rs of Woods County v. Oxley, 8 Okla. 502, 58 P. 651; King v. Horse Chief Eagle, 23 Okla. 532, 101 P. 1135; Gwinnup e......
- White v. Hooker