Marvin v. Elliot
Decision Date | 27 January 1890 |
Citation | 99 Mo. 616,12 S.W. 899 |
Parties | MARVIN et al. v. ELLIOT. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Pettis county; RICHARD FIELD, Judge.
Ejectment by Edward B. Marvin and others against Charles H. Elliot. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendant.
Chas. E. Yeator, for appellants. Sangree & Lamm, for respondent.
This is an action of ejectment for a parcel of ground described by metes and bounds. It is shown to be the same land claimed by the defendant by the description of lot 10, in block 6, of Cotton Bros'. addition to the city of Sedalia. The Cotton Bros. and one Strait, who were the proprietors of the addition, by a deed dated the 21st October, 1867, and recorded on the 23d of the same month, conveyed to Margaret S. Watts "the east half of block No. 6, or all of lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 in said block, in Cotton Brothers' addition." Mrs. Watts and her husband, by their warranty deed dated the 26th November, 1867, and recorded on the 28th of the same month, conveyed to Eliza Carrico "lots 7, 8, 9, and 10 of block 6, in the east half of said block of Cotton Brothers' addition." The defendant acquired lot 10 by several mesne conveyances. Mrs. Carrico, the defendant, and the intermediate purchasers under this chain of title, have had possession since October, 1867. On the 8th June, 1878, Mrs. Watts and her husband made a quitclaim deed to Hartshorn, for the recited consideration of one dollar, to "the east half of block six, in Cotton Brothers' addition," and he conveyed to the plaintiffs. It will be seen the plaintiffs and defendant all claim under Mrs. Watts, the defendant, under possession, and a deed which antedates more than 10 years the quitclaim deed under which plaintiffs set up title. To defeat this elder title, the plaintiffs put in evidence the recorded plat of said addition, from which it appears the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Federal Land Bank of St. Louis v. McColgan
...Wolf v. Dyer, 95 Mo. 551; William v. Butterfield, 214 Mo. 412; Simms v. Thompson, 236 S.W. 876; Sicher v. Rambousek, 193 Mo. 128; Marvin v. Elliott, 99 Mo. 616; Noland v. Bank, 129 Mo. 57. A deed properly is constructive notice in all cases, except where the description is void, because of ......
-
Sharp v. Richardson
...Mo. Utilities, 137 S.W.2d 456; 31 C.J., sec. 405, sec. 446, note 46. (10) Proof of assessment by lots is admissible in evidence. Marion v. Elliott, 99 Mo. 616. (11) The Court has held that where a plat though not acknowledged and therefore not entitled under the law to be recorded, actually......
-
Goff v. Avent
...sufficiency of description in the deeds of conveyance, we cite the following: Bohrer v. Lange, 44 Min. 281, 46 N.W. 358; Marvin v. Elliot, 99 Mo. 616, 12 S.W. 799; Walker v. Lee, 40 So. 880, 51 Fla. 360; Brose Boise City Railway & Terminal Co., 51 C. 753, 5 Idaho 694; Hayden v. Brown, 53 P.......
- Marvin v. Elliot