Marvin v. Marvin
Decision Date | 01 February 1890 |
Citation | 12 S.W. 875 |
Parties | MARVIN <I>v.</I> MARVIN. |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
A man lawfully arrested on a process for seduction cannot, if he marries the woman to procure his discharge, have the marriage avoided upon the ground of duress. The fact that he subsequently discovers that he could not have been convicted will not alter the case, if the prosecution was upon probable cause, and not merely from malice. Bish. Mar. & Div. § 212; 2 Kent, Comm., *453; Honnett v. Honnett, 33 Ark. 156. The prosecution of the appellant was upon probable cause. Let the decree be affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial- Askew v. Murdock Acceptance Corp.
-
Sims v. First Nat. Bank, Harrison
...simulated. See United Life Ins. Co. v. Johnson,199 Ark. 241, 133 S.W.2d 841; Shattuck v. Watson, 53 Ark. 147, 13 S.W. 516; Marvin v. Marvin, 52 Ark. 425, 12 S.W. 875. C. J. Sims had been a customer of the First National Bank for many years. Numerous loans had been made to him and the relati......
-
Union Life Insurance Co. v. Johnson
... ... unless the amount obtained was secured. It was not a threat ... to prosecute on a simulated charge in order to extort money ... Marvin v. Marvin, 52 Ark. 425, 12 S.W. 875, ... 20 Am. St. Rep. 191." ... The ... Marvin Case, cited by Judge HEMINGWAY, was disposed ... ...
-
Union Life Ins. Co. v. Johnson
...his crime unless the amount obtained was secured. It was not a threat to prosecute on a simulated charge in order to extort money. Marvin v. Marvin 12 S.W. 875 The Marvin case, cited by Judge Hemingway, was disposed of by a Per Curiam opinion reading as follows: "Per Curiam. A man lawfully ......