Mascary v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Citation258 Mass. 524
PartiesJOSEPHINE MASCARY v. BOSTON ELEVATED RAILWAY COMPANY.
Decision Date03 March 1927
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

January 19, 1927.

Present: RUGG, C.

J., BRALEY, CROSBY PIERCE, & WAIT, JJ.

Negligence, Street railway: slippery substance on station step. Evidence, Matter of conjecture.

A woman passenger in a subway station of a street railway cannot recover in an action of tort against the street railway company for personal injuries received when she slipped upon a banana peel upon a stairway, where the only evidence as to the presence of the banana peel upon the stairway was that her husband, going forthwith to the place where she fell, found there a part of a banana skin, "dark or black as tar and dry, a little dry skin, very black," and "it was smoothed down; . . . soft . . . as if something had been pressed on it."

TORT for personal injuries. Writ dated September 26, 1923. In the Superior Court, the action was tried before Broadhurst, J. Material evidence is stated in the opinion. The jury found for the plaintiff in the sum of $500 but, before the verdict was recorded, the judge reserved leave under G.L.c. 231, Section 120, to enter a verdict for the defendant. Thereafter a verdict for the defendant was entered and the judge reported the action to this court for determination.

S.P. Sears, (E.K Nash with him,) for the defendant. E. Masters, for the plaintiff.

RUGG, C.J. There was evidence tending to show, in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiff, that, while descending a flight of stairs leading to the Central Square station of the defendant, she slipped and fell, and immediately thereafter a piece of banana peel was found underneath her shoe; that her husband going forthwith to the place where she fell, found there a part of a banana skin, "dark or black as tar, and dry, a little dry skin, very black," and "it was smoothed down; . . . soft . . . as if something had been pressed on it." The defendant owned and controlled the stairway and it was open to the public.

There was no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant. The banana skin may have been dropped a moment before by a stranger to the defendant, or have come upon the stair without fault of the defendant. The case is governed by numerous decisions. Goddard v. Boston & Maine Railroad 179 Mass. 52 . Pearson v. Director General of Railroads, 245 Mass. 158 , 162, 163. O'Neill v. Boston Elevated...

To continue reading

Request your trial
37 cases
  • Picou v. Kansas City Public Service Co.
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • March 6, 1943
    ... ... carrier of passengers for hire, including the street railway ... company, must use the highest skill, care and foresight ... Co. v. Johnson, 14 Ala.App. 558, 71 So. 620; ... Hotenbrink v. Boston Elevated R. Co., 211 Mass. 77, ... 97 N.E. 624, 39 L.R.A.,N.S., 419. She ... Likewise, the ... later case of Mascary v. Boston Elevated R. Co., 258 ... Mass. 524, 155 N.E. 637 ... ...
  • Morrison v. Pacific Northwest Public Service Co.
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • March 6, 1934
    ... ... In ... Heck v. Northern Pacific Railway Co., 59 Mont. 106, ... 196 P. 521, 522, the plaintiff, while ... falling on a banana peeling, Goddard v. Boston & M. R ... R., 179 Mass. 52, 60 N.E. 486, Mr. Chief Justice ... Davis v. South Side Elevated R. Co., 292 Ill. 378, ... 127 N.E. 66, 10 A. L. R. 254 (banana peel ... facts." ... In the ... later case of Mascary v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co., ... 258 Mass. 524, 155 N.E. 637, the ... ...
  • Beach v. S.S. Kresge Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • April 18, 1939
    ...R. Whipple Co., 230 Mass. 19, 119 N.E. 191;O'Neill v. Boston Elevated Railway Co., 248 Mass. 362, 142 N.E. 904;Mascary v. Boston Elevated Railway Co., 258 Mass. 524, 155 N.E. 637;Sisson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co., 277 Mass. 431, 178 N.E. 733;Tariff v. S. S. Kresge Co., Mass., 12 N.E.2d ......
  • Seidenberg v. Eastern Massachusetts St. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • March 27, 1929
    ...Elevated Railway, 250 Mass. 192, 145 N. E. 259;O'Neill v. Boston Elevated Railway, 248 Mass. 362, 142 N. E. 904;Mascary v. Boston Elevated Railway, 258 Mass. 524, 155 N. E. 637;Bornstein v. R. H. White Co., 259 Mass. 34, 155 N. E. 661. It is too well settled for discussion or for repetition......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT