Mascenic v. Anderson
| Citation | 53 Ill.App.3d 971,11 Ill.Dec. 718,369 N.E.2d 172 |
| Decision Date | 11 October 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 76-1173,76-1173 |
| Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
| Parties | , 11 Ill.Dec. 718 Joseph MASCENIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sharon ANDERSON and Harold Margules, Defendants-Appellees. |
Hillard Garlousky, Chicago, for plaintiff-appellant.
Charles T. Booher, Jr., Chicago, for defendants-appellees.
Plaintiff, Joseph Mascenic, brought an equitable action in the circuit court of Cook County seeking the declaration of a constructive or resulting trust upon certain real property commonly known as 450 Hickory Drive in Wheeling, Illinois and held in an Illinois Land Trust of which defendant, Sharon Anderson, is the sole beneficiary. The court, upon a bench trial, found plaintiff's complaint and the evidence adduced in support thereof to be sufficient to support the relief sought. However, the court barred recovery upon application of the equitable doctrine of "unclean hands." The sole issue presented for review concerns the propriety of the court's action in the latter regard.
Plaintiff alleged inter alia that he and his paramour, defendant Anderson, agreed to purchase the aforementioned real property for their joint ownership and occupancy; that he retained the legal services of co-defendant Harold Margules with regard to this purchase; that upon the advice of Margules and with the intention of avoiding potential encumbrances upon the property, title was taken in an Illinois Land Trust of which defendant was made sole beneficiary; that plaintiff made payment of $7,500 towards purchase of the property; and, that defendants thereafter conspired to defraud plaintiff of his beneficial interest in the property. Defendants' response denied the existence of such a conspiracy and asserted that plaintiff's financial contribution was in the nature of a gift.
The trial court, upon consideration of the conflicting evidence adduced at trial, described the situation as a "classic case" for the imposition of a resulting trust. Our review of the record supports the judgment of the court in this regard.
However, in light of plaintiff's admission that the real property was placed in a land trust solely to prevent plaintiff's spouse from obtaining any interest in the property in the event of divorce proceedings, the trial court barred plaintiff's recovery upon application of the doctrine of "unclean hands."
We deem it well-settled that misconduct on the part of a plaintiff which will...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jaffe Commercial Finance Co. v. Harris
...... (Shadden v. Zimmerlee (1948), 401 Ill. 118, 127-28, 81 N.E.2d 477; Mascenic v. Anderson (1st Dist.1977), 53 Ill.App.3d 971, 972, 11 Ill.Dec. 718, 369 N.E.2d 172.) Furthermore, Illinois decisional law provides that the ......
-
Polk Bros., Inc. v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.
...v. McDonald's Corp., 97 Ill.App.3d 495, 501, 52 Ill.Dec. 957, 962, 422 N.E.2d 1166, 1171 (1981); Mascenic v. Anderson, 53 Ill.App.3d 971, 972, 11 Ill.Dec. 718, 719, 369 N.E.2d 172, 173 (1977); Illinois Power Co. v. Latham, 15 Ill.App.3d 156, 168, 303 N.E.2d 448, 457 (1973). The Illinois cas......
-
Edens View Realty & Inv., Inc. v. Heritage Enterprises, Inc.
...however, is not a judicial straightjacket and its application is a matter for sound judicial discretion. Mascenic v. Anderson (1977), 53 Ill.App.3d 971, 11 Ill.Dec. 718, 369 N.E.2d 172. Basically, defendant asserts that plaintiff's recovery is precluded as a result of its wrongdoing in fals......
-
David v. Russo
...... "The origin of the confidence and the source of influence are immaterial. It exists when one person trusts in and relies on another." (Anderson v. Lybeck (1958), 15 Ill.2d 227, 232, 154 N.E.2d 259, 262.) "The relationship may be moral, social, domestic, or merely personal." (Anderson, at ... Mascenic v. Anderson (1977), 53 Ill.App.3d 971, 972, 11 Ill.Dec. 718, 719, 369 N.E.2d 172, 173. In the present case, there was no direct ......