Mason v. Carter, 23802
| Decision Date | 06 January 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 23802,23802 |
| Citation | 153 S.E.2d 162,223 Ga. 2 |
| Parties | Allie R. MASON et al. v. Opal CARTER. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court
1. The uncontradicted evidence showed that the decree obtained by appellant, Mrs. Mason, canceling appellee's husband's interest in certain property was null and void since the court had no jurisdiction of the person of the husband, and that appellee succeeded to a 1/2 undivided interest in the property at her husband's death and, thus, was entitled to a directed verdict in her favor.
2. The attack on the 1954 judgment on the ground that it is void is not barred by the statute of limitation since, under the Georgia statute, Code §§ 110-701, 110-709, a void judgment 'is a mere nullity, and may be so held in any court when it becomes material to the interest of the parties to consider it,' and, it is not barred by laches.
3. The trial court did not err in directing a verdict in favor of appellee.
Bradford, Maddox & Baird, Kermit C. Bradford, Atlanta, for appellants.
Grant, Spears & Duckworth, William G. Grant, Atlanta, for appellee.
Mrs. Opal Carter sought a declaratory judgment to establish that she is the owner of a 1/2 undivided interest in certain residential property subject to a life estate reserved by defendant, Mrs. Allie R. Mason. By amendment to her petition, plaintiff sought to join Mrs. Gladys Johnson as a party defendant on the grund that Mrs. Mason had purported to convey to her by two deeds the entire interest in the property for the purpose of defrauding plaintiff by depriving her of her 1/2 undivided interest in it and prayed for cancellation of the deeds. After hearing testimony and the introduction of documentary evidence the trial judge granted a directed verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The appeal is from the order directing the verdict.
1. The first question is whether the evidence demanded the direction of a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Code Ann. § 110-104; Security Life & Trust Co. v. Smith, 220 Ga. 744, 747(2), 141 S.E.2d 405; Kesler v. Kesler, 219 Ga. 592(1), 134 S.E.2d 811; Smallpiece v. Johnson, 210 Ga. 310(1), 80 S.E.2d 296; City of Abbeville v. Jay ex rel. Syms, 205 Ga. 743, 55 S.E.2d 129. The uncontradicted evidence shows that in 1939 Mrs. Allie R. Mason conveyed a house and lot by warranty deed to her daughter and her daughter's husband, Mr. and Mrs. Clyde Wills, and expressly reserved to the grantor a life estate with the right of possession during her natural life. The deed was given in consideration of 'love and affection and other valuable considerations,' the grantees agreeing to pay the balance then due on the loan against the property.
Clyde Wills divorced his wife, Mrs. Mason's daughter, in January, 1942, and married the appellee in June, 1942. Wills died in 1947 leaving as his sole heir at law, his widow, the appellee, who has since remarried and is now Mrs. Opal Carter.
In 1953, six years after the death of Wills, Mrs. Mason brought an action to cancel the deed as to Wills' 1/2 undivided interest in the property, naming Wills as the only defendant 'whose present whereabouts is unknown,' and service was by publication. Upon obtaining a decree canceling Wills' interest in the property, Mrs. Mason's daughter, now Mrs. Gladys Johnson conveyed to her mother her 1/2 undivided interest in the property.
Defendant, Mrs. Mason, filed an answer to the petition in the present proceeding alleging that she had conveyed the property by warranty deed to her daughter, Mrs. Johnson, two months prior to the filing of the petition by appellee. Thereupon, appellee filed an amendment to her petition praying that Mrs. Johnson be made a party defendant and that the deed executed by Mrs. Mason to Mrs. Johnson conveying the interest she claims be set aside.
Both Mrs. Mason and Mrs. Johnson testified that the deed to Mrs. Johnson was merely voluntary in nature so that Mrs. Johnson could gain an advantage on her income tax.
It is...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Estate of Holland v. Commissioner
...Ham v. Watkins, 181 S.E.2d 490, 492 (Ga. 1971). Nor can a life tenant convey any greater title than he or she may own. Mason v. Carter, 153 S.E.2d 162, 164 (Ga. 1967); Rigdon v. Cooper, 47 S.E.2d 633, 637 (Ga. 1948). Thus, it is clear that although decedent intended each year to transfer fr......
-
Griggs v. Dodson
...1. The first question is whether the evidence demanded the verdict for defendant, appellee. See Code Ann. § 110-104; Mason v. Carter, 223 Ga. 2, 153 S.E.2d 162; Security Life & Trust Co. v. Smith, 220 Ga. 744, 747(2), 141 S.E.2d 405; Kesler v. Kesler, 219 Ga. 592(1), 134 S.E.2d 811; Smallpi......
-
Murphy v. Murphy
...judgments on the ground that they are void at any time, however long after the rendition of the judgment. [Cits.]" Mason v. Carter, 223 Ga. 2, 4(2), 153 S.E.2d 162 (1967), overruled on other grounds, Watson v. Watson, 235 Ga. 136, 138, 218 S.E.2d 863 (1975). It further avoids the problem in......
-
Price v. Price
...the conveyance by quitclaim deed was voluntary and not for value. See Martin v. White, at 871-873, 42 S.E. 279; Mason v. Carter, 223 Ga. 2, 3-4, 153 S.E.2d 162 (1967), overruled on other grounds by Watson v. Watson, 235 Ga. 136, 218 S.E.2d 863 (1975) (property deeded from mother to daughter......
-
"garbage In, Garbage Out": the Litigation Implosion Over the Unconstitutional Organization and Jurisdiction of the City Court of Atlanta - Edward C. Brewer Iii
...until conviction is final); Kearse v. Paulk, 264 Ga. 509, 448 S.E.2d 369 (1994); Jackson v. Lowry, 170 Ga. 755, 154 S.E.2d 228 (1930). 211. 223 Ga. 2, 153 S.E.2d 162 (1967). 212. 183 Ga. App. 729, 360 S.E.2d 400 (1987), overruled on other grounds by Gonzalez v. Abbott, 262 Ga. 671, 673, 425......