Masonry v. Miller Const., 89-1348

Decision Date09 February 1990
Docket NumberNo. 89-1348,89-1348
Parties15 Fla. L. Weekly D382, 15 Fla. L. Weekly D840 Atlantic MASONRY, et al., Appellants, v. MILLER CONSTRUCTION, et al., Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

William S. Blatt of Anthony J. Beisler, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, for appellants.

Wendy Ellen Marfino of Miller, Hodges, Kagan & Chait, Professional Association, Deerfield Beach, for appellees.

ERVIN, Judge.

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company ("Liberty") provided workers' compensation coverage to Atlantic Masonry ("Atlantic"), a subcontractor, from January 10, 1986 until October 24, 1986, when Liberty cancelled Atlantic's policy for nonpayment of premiums. However, Liberty erroneously sent a renewal policy and declarations page to Atlantic, indicating coverage would be provided for the year January 10, 1987 through January 10, 1988. The president of Atlantic provided this declarations page and policy to general contractor Miller Construction Co. ("Miller"), in December of 1986, as proof of workers' compensation coverage for the coming year when, in fact, Atlantic had no such coverage. On January 12, 1987, an employee of Atlantic, Michael Powell, was injured on the job site, and FEISCO, Miller's workers' compensation carrier, thereafter complied with its statutory duty to pay Powell compensation and medical benefits.

FEISCO sought and obtained reimbursement of benefits from Liberty on the ground that Liberty should be equitably estopped from denying coverage to Atlantic under the erroneously issued policy. Liberty now appeals an order of the judge of compensation claims ("JCC") requiring Liberty to reimburse FEISCO for workers' compensation benefits paid and to provide future benefits to Michael Powell. We affirm.

Under the doctrine of promissory estoppel, Liberty is estopped from denying its promise to provide workers' compensation coverage to Atlantic between January 10, 1987 and January 10, 1988. See Crown Life Ins. Co. v. McBride, 517 So.2d 660 (Fla.1987). According to the testimony presented by Miller, if Atlantic had failed to produce proof of insurance by January 10, 1987, it would not have been permitted on the job site, thus Powell would not have been injured there on January 12, 1987.

Liberty claims that a third party (Miller) may not assert this equitable doctrine, and that it is available only to the entity to whom the erroneous representation was directly made (Atlantic). Liberty relies upon Crown Life for the position that the supreme court did not extend the remedy of promissory estoppel to third persons in that case. However, Crown Life did not involve a claim by a third party; therefore the court cannot be said to have decided that issue.

On the other hand, we find that the following provision from the Restatement (Secon...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Pennsy Supply v. Amer. Ash Recycling Corp.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • 17 Marzo 2006
    ...reliance by the third party is shown, courts have been willing to endorse the broad reach of Section 90. See Masonry v. Miller Construction, 558 So.2d 433 (Fla. App.1990) (holding subcontractor's insurer was estopped from denying coverage under policy erroneously issued to subcontractor whe......
  • Norero v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • 31 Marzo 2015
  • Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. v. Garden of Eat'n of Tampa, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida
    • 2 Septiembre 2011
    ...parties to an insurance contract, such as Gafford, only under a narrow set of circumstances. For example, in Masonry v. Miller Constr., 558 So. 2d 433, 434 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), Liberty Mutual provided Masonry, a subcontractor, with workers' compensation coverage. Id. at 434. Liberty Mutual ......
  • Rissman on Behalf of Rissman Inv. Co. v. Kilbourne
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 22 Septiembre 1994
    ...by city's agent estopped city from requiring subcontract to pay systems changes on facility); see also Atlantic Masonry v. Miller Constr., 558 So.2d 433 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (third party may assert promissory estoppel); Fotomat Corp. of Florida v. R.B. Films, Inc., 366 So.2d 1213 (Fla. 1st D......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Contract cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Causes of Action
    • 1 Abril 2022
    ...Inc. v. Jensen Civil Construction, Inc. , 728 So.2d 297, 302 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). 2 Atlantic Masonry v. Miller Construction , 558 So.2d 433, 434 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). 3. Criterion Leasing Group v. Gulf Coast Plastering & Drywall , 582 So.2d 799, 800 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). CONTRACT CASES §3:50 ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT