Matheson v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'n
Decision Date | 22 September 1917 |
Docket Number | No. 31361.,31361. |
Citation | 164 N.W. 194,180 Iowa 1019 |
Parties | MATHESON v. IOWA STATE TRAVELING MEN'S ASS'N. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from District Court, Polk County; Lawrence De Graff, Judge.
Action at law to recover indemnity under a certificate of membership in defendant association. There was a trial to a jury, and a verdict and judgment for plaintiff for the amount claimed, $1,250, interest and costs. The defendant appeals. Plaintiff has also appealed from the ruling of the court in permitting defendant to amend its answer. Reversed on defendant's appeal and affirmed on plaintiff's.Sullivan & Sullivan, of Des Moines, for appellant.
Dowell, McLennan & Zeuch, of Des Moines, for appellee.
Plaintiff alleges that he became a member of defendant association February 11, 1913. A copy of his certificate of membership and a copy of the articles of incorporation, and by-laws referred to therein are made a part of the petition; that such exhibits and application constitute the contract between the plaintiff and defendant; that on September 27, 1913, in the state of California, and while plaintiff was in good standing in defendant association, he sustained bodily injuries through external, violent, and accidental means, as follows: While plaintiff was riding in his buggy the horse became suddenly frightened, turned the buggy quickly, causing plaintiff to be thrown against the iron frame of the buggy, and to strike his left eye against the frame; that plaintiff did not then know he had received any injury which would result in any impairment in the sight of his eye; that he immediately consulted a physician and was advised that no injury had been done to the eye, and that plaintiff would not be incapacitatedas a result of the injury; that on January 29, 1914, the same physician advised plaintiff that he would totally lose the sight of said eye, and as a result of said injury plaintiff has totally lost the sight of his eye; that within 15 days from the time plaintiff had knowledge that said accident would result in the impairment of his sight, he notified defendant in writing of said accident and the injury therefrom; that one of the by-laws of defendant association provides:
“Or if such injuries shall result in the loss within ninety days from the date of said injury of the entire sight of one eye, the member shall receive as indemnity the sum of $1,250.”
Plaintiff further alleged that at the date of his injury, and at the time of the discovery of the same, he had lost the sight of his eye, and was therefore entitled to $1,250; that plaintiff has demanded the compensation provided in the contract, but that defendant has failed and refused, and now refuses, to pay any part thereof; that by reason of the said acts of injury resulting therefrom and by reason of his membership in said association, said sum is due plaintiff. For answer defendant denied all allegations of the petition; denied that plaintiff ever furnished any notice of injury, or proof of loss, or disability, within the time and in the manner and form provided in the by-laws, and that by reason thereof there is no liability on the part of defendant. For further answer defendant alleged that if plaintiff sustained bodily injuries as alleged, they were not sustained through external, violent, and accidental means. Afterwards, and by way of amendment to answer and over plaintiff's objection, defendant stated that it was provided in the contract sued on that:
“No action of any kind or character shall be commenced in any court against the association to recover any benefit or indemnity provided for in this article, unless the same shall be commenced within twelve months after the cause of action accrues, and after said period all liability of this association to such member, beneficiary or heirs for indemnity and benefits on account of such injuries shall cease and end.”
Defendant charged at the time of the commencement of this action more than 12 months had elapsed after the cause of action herein had accrued, and that by reason of all the foregoing there was no liability. As to the nature of the injury and the effects of it, after stating how it occurred, plaintiff, as a witness, says:
Plaintiff testifies that he followed the treatment which the doctor had prescribed with the hope that, as Dr. Thomas had advised him, the sight might be restored, and that the first time the doctor advised him that the sight was gone was on January 12, 1914. He says the reason he did not notify defendant of the injury until after January 12, 1914, was because he relied upon the statements of the doctor that the loss of his eyesight might be restored if he followed the treatment. Plaintiff further testifies:
Plaintiff further states that after the doctor advised him that his eyesight was gone he notified defendant, and accordingly mailed a letter or notice to defendant February 18, 1914, as follows:
“Oakland, Cal. February 18, 1914.
James Lowe Christie Matheson.
No. 1202 Hampel Street, Oakland, Calif.”
This notice was received by the defendant company February 24, 1914. Dr. Thomas also sent a report to defendant, as follows:
“Physician's Notification and Report to the Iowa State Traveling Men's Association and to A. W. Rader, Its Secretary, of the Examination of James Lowe Christie Matheson.
The undersigned physician, Howard G. Thomas, M. D., notifies the said association as follows: That he is a duly licensed and practicing physician under the laws of the state of California, having his office at rooms 509-514, Dalziel Building, No. 532 15th street, Oakland, California. That on September 29, 1913, at about half past two o'clock p. m., thereof, the above-named James Lowe Christie Matheson came to my office for medical examination and treatment. He stated to me that on the preceding Saturday, viz. September 27, 1913, he had met with an accident when on his way to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Matheson v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'n
... ... 176; Peele v ... Provident Fund Society, (Ind.) 44 N.E. 661 (46 N.E ... 990); Rorick v. Railway Officials', etc., Acc ... Assn., 119 F. 63 (55 C.C.A. 369); Odd Fellows ... Fraternal Acc. Assn. v. Earl, 70 F. 16 (16 C.C.A. 596); ... Hoffman v. Manufacturers' Accident ... ...