Matlock v. Williams

Decision Date31 January 1875
CitationMatlock v. Williams, 59 Mo. 105 (Mo. 1875)
PartiesGEORGE MATLOCK, Appellant, v. MARCUS WILLIAMS et al. Respondents.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Cooper Circuit Court.

Ewing & Smith, and John Cosgrove, with McMillen Bros., for Appellant.

Draffen & Williams, for Respondents.

SHERWOOD, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

Suit to enforce mechanic's lien. The trial before the court resulted in a general judgment against the contractor, and a judgment in favor of the other defendants. The answers of the defendants were separate ones, and both denied the chief allegations of the petition, and among them that the lien was filed, etc., within the requisite statutory period. The plaintiff filed his replies to these answers. But the account which was filed with the clerk of the Circuit Court, showing the date of its filing, and proper verification, is not to be found incorporated in the bill of exceptions, nor even among the other papers contained in the transcript.

It is true that the parties have stipulated that “the plaintiff read in evidence his mechanic's lien;” but as to the contents and component parts of that paper, the date of its filing, its compliance with the requisitions of the statute, we are left to conjecture. But even if there were no fault to find in this respect there are objections equally fatal as to the giving of the declaration of law No. 2, on the part of the defendants...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
28 cases
  • State v. Anderson
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 30, 1885
    ...in the opinion, this can only be done by the bill itself, since what is done at the trial can only thus be known and preserved. Matlock v. Williams, 59 Mo. 105; Campbell v. Allen, 61 Mo. 582. It may be conceded that the bill of exceptions, in the transcript now before us, sufficiently ident......
  • Baker v. Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 24, 1894
    ...to the action of the lower court which were not made the basis of a motion for a new trial. Cowen v. Railroad Co., 48 Mo. 556; Matlock v. Williams, 59 Mo. 105; Haynes v. Town of Trenton, 108 Mo. 123, 18 S. W. 1003; Gordon v. Gordon, 13 Mo. 215; Broughton v. Brand, 94 Mo. 169, 7 S. W. 119, —......
  • Baker v. The Kansas City, fort Scott & Memphis v. Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 4, 1894
    ... ... locomotive.'" ...          In the ... more recent case of Myers v. Railroad , 24 A. 747, ... Williams, J., said: "The rule is now well settled in ... this state that one approaching a railroad crossing upon a ... public highway must stop, look and ... were not made the basis of a motion for a new trial ... Cowen v. Railroad , 48 Mo. 556; Matlock v ... Williams , 59 Mo. 105; Haynes v. Trenton , 108 ... Mo. 123, 18 S.W. 1003; Gordon v. Gordon , 13 Mo. 215; ... Broughton v. Brand , 94 Mo ... ...
  • Whitmore v. Supreme Lodge Knights & Ladies of Honor
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 24, 1890
    ...of the trial court, in the motion for new trial, the appellate court will disregard the complaint. State v. Preston, 77 Mo. 295; Matlock v. Williams, 59 Mo. 105; State Degonia, 69 Mo. 490. (3) Courts will enforce all reasonable laws and rules established by benevolent societies for their gu......
  • Get Started for Free