Matson v. Capelle

Decision Date31 January 1876
Citation62 Mo. 235
PartiesABRAHAM S. MATSON, Respondent, v. JOHN P. CAPELLE, et al., Appellants.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

For facts presented and points decided, see O'Neil vs. Capelle, 62 Mo. 202.

H. Berry, with Alex. Hamilton, for Appellants.

S. N. Holliday, for Respondent.

SHERWOOD, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

This case is on all fours with that of O'Neil against the same defendant, decided at the present term. His Honor, Judge Jones, decided that case, and his Honor, Judge Lindley, decided this one; and on evidence, which, in all its essential features, is the same, arrived at similar conclusions, and there is no reason to doubt the correctness of those conclusions, established so clearly as they are by that evidence.

The chief point of difference (if difference it can be called) between the two cases is, that Mrs. O'Neil was the purchaser of Robbin's equity of redemption in certain lands at private sale, and the plaintiff was the purchaser of Robbin's equity of redemption in certain other lands under execution. The plaintiff occupies, therefore, the same substantial footing as does Mrs. O'Neil. (Ryland vs. Callison, 54 Mo., 513.)

For like reasons as those given in her case, the judgment must be affirmed.

Judge Vories absent; the other judges concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Hannah v. Davis
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 12, 1892
    ... ... Revised ... Statutes 1889, sec. 4915; Eddy v. Baldwin, 23 Mo ... 588; Neff v. Seely, 49 Mo. 209; Matson v ... Capelle, 62 Mo. 235. Second. As both plaintiffs and ... defendants claimed through the same person, Frank D. Mills, ... it was unnecessary ... ...
  • Lincoln v. Thompson
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 30, 1882
    ...451; Grace v. Wade, 45 Texas 529; Maupin v. Emmons, 47 Mo. 306; Draper v. Bryson, 26 Mo. 108; Ryland v. Callison, 54 Mo. 513; Matson v. Capelle, 62 Mo. 235; Ford v. French, 72 Mo. 250; De Witt v. Harvey, 4 Gray 486; Harrison v. Hollis, 2 Nott & M. 578; Sevier v. Ross, 1 Free. Ch. 519; Duval......
  • Lindell Real Estate Co. v. Lindell
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 17, 1896
    ... ... fraud as against such creditor. Freeman on Executions, sec ... 335; Ryland v. Callison, 54 Mo. 513; Gentry v ... Robinson, 55 Mo. 260; Matson v. Capelle, 62 Mo ... 235; Rogers v. Tucker, 70 Mo. 457; Shirley v ... Fearne, 33 Miss. 653. (3) The circuit court of the city ... of St. Louis ... ...
  • Turner v. Butler
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 22, 1894
    ...the interest of the mortgagor is substituted to all his rights, and may maintain a bill for an accounting and to redeem. ""Matson v. Capelle, 62 Mo. 235; ""O'Neil v. Capelle, 62 Mo. 202. (4) assignee, whether he be assignee or the mortgagor of the equity of redemption, stands in the place o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT