Matter Linda T.

Citation373 N.Y.S.2d 541,36 N.Y.2d 928
Parties, 335 N.E.2d 848 In the Matter of LINDA T., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.
Decision Date11 June 1975
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Order, 44 A.D.2d 524, 353 N.Y.S.2d 204, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. All concur except Fuchsberg and Cooke, JJ., who dissent and vote to reverse on the dissenting memorandum by Mr. Justice Francis T. Murphy, Jr., at the Appellate Division.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • People v. Menna
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 11, 1975
  • People v. Moore
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 24, 1990
    ...instruction to the jury (Penal Law § 20.00; see, Matter of Linda T., 44 A.D.2d 524, 525, 353 N.Y.S.2d 204, affd. 36 N.Y.2d 928, 373 N.Y.S.2d 541, 335 N.E.2d 848). However, defendant's claim that the evidence also warranted a jury charge regarding entrapment is unpreserved for appellate revi......
  • People v. Patton
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 6, 1986
    ...properly be found guilty of the substantive crime (see, Matter of Linda T., 44 A.D.2d 524, 525, 353 N.Y.S.2d 524, affd. 36 N.Y.2d 928, 373 N.Y.S.2d 541, 335 N.E.2d 848). The judgment of conviction should, therefore, be Judgment affirmed. MAHONEY, P.J., and KANE, WEISS and LEVINE, JJ., concur. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT