MATTER OF ABRAHAMS,

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
Citation3 N.Y.3d 601,816 NE 2d 194
Decision Date24 June 2004
PartiesMATTER OF ABRAHAMS

3 N.Y.3d 601
816 NE 2d 194

MATTER OF ABRAHAMS

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided June 24, 2004.


Motion for leave to appeal denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 practice notes
  • Active Retirement Community, Inc. v. Tritec/Klewin Constructors, L.L.C., 2009 NY Slip Op 31071 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 5/5/2009), Index No. 31510-2007
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • May 5, 2009
    ...(see, Culinary Connection Holdings, Inc. v. Culinary Connection of Great Neck, Inc., 1 A.D.3d 558, 769 N.Y.S.2d 544 lv. to app'l den'd 3 N.Y.3d 601, 782 N.Y.S.2d 404, 816 N.E.2d 194; see generally, Hooper Assocs. v. AGS Computers, 74 N.Y.2d 487, 549 N.Y.S.2d 365, 548 N.E.2d 903; Matter of A......
  • Abrahams v. Appellate Div. Of Supreme Court, No. 05 Civ. 4053(SCR)(GAY).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • February 7, 2007
    ...620, 808 N.E.2d 1273, 1273, 777 N.Y.S.2d 13, 14 (2004). Soon thereafter, the Court of Appeals then denied leave to appeal. In re Abrahams, 3 N.Y.3d 601, 816 N.E.2d 194, 782 N.Y.S.2d 404 Plaintiff filed his Complaint before this Court on April 22, 2005. In his Amended Complaint, filed on Jul......
  • Hubbard  v. Cnty. of Madison
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • March 1, 2012
    ...A.D.3d 1108, 1108–1109, 804 N.Y.S.2d 219 [2005]; Preston v. State of New York, 6 A.D.3d 835, 835–836, 775 N.Y.S.2d 115 [2004], lv. denied 3 N.Y.3d 601, 782 N.Y.S.2d 404, 816 N.E.2d 194 [2004] ). Here, the uncontradicted proof submitted by the County established that it did not design Robert......
  • Lake v. State, No. 118699.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Claims
    • September 25, 2015
    ...804 N.Y.S.2d 219 [4th Dept 2005] ; Preston v. State of New York, 6 A.D.3d 835, 835–836, 775 N.Y.S.2d 115 [3d Dept 2004], lv denied 3 N.Y.3d 601 [2004] ). Repaving the road surface does not constitute significant repair or reconstruction to require compliance with modern highway design stand......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
23 cases
  • Active Retirement Community, Inc. v. Tritec/Klewin Constructors, L.L.C., 2009 NY Slip Op 31071 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 5/5/2009), Index No. 31510-2007
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • May 5, 2009
    ...(see, Culinary Connection Holdings, Inc. v. Culinary Connection of Great Neck, Inc., 1 A.D.3d 558, 769 N.Y.S.2d 544 lv. to app'l den'd 3 N.Y.3d 601, 782 N.Y.S.2d 404, 816 N.E.2d 194; see generally, Hooper Assocs. v. AGS Computers, 74 N.Y.2d 487, 549 N.Y.S.2d 365, 548 N.E.2d 903; Matter of A......
  • Abrahams v. Appellate Div. Of Supreme Court, No. 05 Civ. 4053(SCR)(GAY).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • February 7, 2007
    ...620, 808 N.E.2d 1273, 1273, 777 N.Y.S.2d 13, 14 (2004). Soon thereafter, the Court of Appeals then denied leave to appeal. In re Abrahams, 3 N.Y.3d 601, 816 N.E.2d 194, 782 N.Y.S.2d 404 Plaintiff filed his Complaint before this Court on April 22, 2005. In his Amended Complaint, filed on Jul......
  • Hubbard  v. Cnty. of Madison
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • March 1, 2012
    ...A.D.3d 1108, 1108–1109, 804 N.Y.S.2d 219 [2005]; Preston v. State of New York, 6 A.D.3d 835, 835–836, 775 N.Y.S.2d 115 [2004], lv. denied 3 N.Y.3d 601, 782 N.Y.S.2d 404, 816 N.E.2d 194 [2004] ). Here, the uncontradicted proof submitted by the County established that it did not design Robert......
  • Lake v. State, No. 118699.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Claims
    • September 25, 2015
    ...804 N.Y.S.2d 219 [4th Dept 2005] ; Preston v. State of New York, 6 A.D.3d 835, 835–836, 775 N.Y.S.2d 115 [3d Dept 2004], lv denied 3 N.Y.3d 601 [2004] ). Repaving the road surface does not constitute significant repair or reconstruction to require compliance with modern highway design stand......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT