Matter of Adc Contracting & Construction, Inc. v. Town of Southampton, 2007-01312.

Decision Date22 April 2008
Docket Number2007-01312.,2007-06363.
PartiesIn the Matter of ADC CONTRACTING & CONSTRUCTION, INC., Respondent, v. TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON et al., Appellants, et al., Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, the petition is denied in its entirety, and the proceeding is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated June 22, 2007 is dismissed as academic in light of our determination on the appeal from the judgment; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the appellants.

In January 2000 the petitioner was awarded a contract to construct an animal shelter in the Town of Southampton. During the course of the project, a wage dispute arose, as a consequence of which the New York State Department of Labor (hereinafter the Department of Labor) directed the Town to hold certain money in trust pursuant to Labor Law § 220-b for payment of employee wages. The wage dispute was thereafter resolved, and in April 2004 the Department of Labor authorized the Town to release the sum of $149,541.97 from the funds which had been withheld. However, the Town continued to withhold this sum because a breach of contract action arising from the petitioner's performance of the subject construction contract was pending. The petitioner thereafter commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus seeking, inter alia, to compel the Town to release the money which it held in trust. In their answer, the Town, its Council members, Supervisor, and Comptroller (hereinafter the appellants) asserted, as an objection in point of law, that the petition was barred by res judicata. After the breach of contract action terminated in the Town's favor, the Supreme Court granted the petition in this proceeding to the extent of directing the appellants to pay the petitioner the sum of $149,541.97 with interest. We reverse the judgment insofar as appealed from.

"Under the doctrine of res judicata, a disposition on the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Gansburg v. Blachman
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • January 30, 2015
  • Bayer v. City of N.Y.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 26, 2014
    ...” ( Pondview Corp. v. Blatt, 95 A.D.3d 980, 980, 943 N.Y.S.2d 754, quoting Matter of ADC Contr. & Constr., Inc. v. Town of Southampton, 50 A.D.3d 1025, 1026, 855 N.Y.S.2d 679). Thus, the doctrine of res judicata “operates to preclude the renewal of issues actually litigated and resolved in ......
  • Douglas Elliman, LLC v. Bergere
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 22, 2012
  • Pondview Corp. v. Blatt
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 8, 2012
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT