Matter of Allstate Insurance Company v. Leach

Decision Date28 February 2005
Docket Number2004-02823.
Citation15 A.D.3d 649,789 N.Y.S.2d 910,2005 NY Slip Op 01526
PartiesIn the Matter of ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent-Appellant, v. SUSIE LEACH, Respondent. PROVIDENCE WASHINGTON INS. CO., Additional Appellant-Respondent, et al., Additional Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the cross appeal by Allstate Insurance Company is dismissed, as it is not aggrieved by the judgment cross-appealed from (see CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to Allstate Insurance Company payable by Providence Washington Ins. Co.

The cross appeal by Allstate Insurance Company (hereinafter Allstate) must be dismissed because it is not aggrieved by the judgment. However, on the appeal by Providence Mutual Ins. Co. (hereinafter Providence), Allstate's argument that uninsured motorist arbitration must be stayed on the ground that Providence failed to provide a notice of disclaimer to the driver of its insured's vehicle is considered an alternate ground for affirmance (see Fernandez v Stepping Stone Day School, 291 AD2d 530, 531 [2002]). We affirm the judgment granting the petition for a permanent stay of uninsured motorist arbitration on this alternate ground (see Insurance Law § 3420[e]; Matter of Eveready Ins. Co. v Dabach, 176 AD2d 879 [1991]).

The parties' remaining contentions are improperly raised for the first time on appeal.

Luciano, J.P., Crane, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Despinos-Cadet v. Stein
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 26 Octubre 2022
    ...1191, 101 N.Y.S.3d 617 ; Tadco Constr. Corp. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 73 A.D.3d 1022, 1023, 900 N.Y.S.2d 687 ; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Leach, 15 A.D.3d 649, 789 N.Y.S.2d 910 ). The defendant failed to meet his prima facie burden of demonstrating that the plaintiff did not sustain a seri......
  • Tadco Const. Corp. v. Allstate Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 18 Mayo 2010
    ...Bus Sys. v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 N.Y.2d 539, 545-546, 470 N.Y.S.2d 564, 458 N.E.2d 1241; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Leach, 15 A.D.3d 649, 789 N.Y.S.2d 910). In seeking to vacate its default, the defendant was required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and ......
  • Matter of Allstate Insurance Company v. Esposito, 2004-07535.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 28 Febrero 2005
  • In the Matter of Estate of Cohn
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 28 Febrero 2005

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT