MATTER OF ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Vargas
| Decision Date | 13 November 2001 |
| Citation | 288 A.D.2d 309,732 N.Y.S.2d 891 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Parties | In the Matter of ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,<BR>v.<BR>JOSE VARGAS et al., Respondents. |
Ritter, J. P., Goldstein, Friedmann, Feuerstein and Crane, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the CPLR and the rules of this Court (see, CPLR 5526; 22 NYCRR 670.10 [a] [1]), with one bill of costs payable to the respondent United States Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company.
It is the appellant's obligation to assemble a proper record on appeal. The record must contain all of the relevant papers that were before the Supreme Court, including the transcript, if any, of the proceedings (see, CPLR 5526). The record submitted on this appeal renders meaningful appellate review of the Supreme Court's determination virtually impossible. Therefore, dismissal of the instant appeal is the appropriate disposition (see, Singh v Getty Petroleum Corp., 275 AD2d 740; Patel v Patel, 270 AD2d 241).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Konstantin v. 630 Third Ave. Assocs. (In re Re)
... ... 's time, and speed the disposition of cases” ( Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. [Brooklyn Nav. Shipyard ... liable where components manufactured by a different company contained asbestos insulation. Although that decision ... D.3d at 579, 910 N.Y.S.2d 55; see also Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Vargas, 288 A.D.2d 309, 732 N.Y.S.2d 891 [2d ... Union Carbide was an insurance ... ...
-
Schwartz v. Schwartz
... ... 's case pursuant to CPLR 4401, for judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint.ORDERED that the appeal is ... A.D.2d 494, 495, 736 N.Y.S.2d 115; see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Vargas, 288 A.D.2d 309, 310, 732 N.Y.S.2d 891; ... ...
-
In re Lynch
...1292, 923 N.Y.S.2d 900 ; Emco Tech Constr. Corp. v. Pilavas, 68 A.D.3d 918, 918–919, 892 N.Y.S.2d 426 ; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Vargas, 288 A.D.2d 309, 310, 732 N.Y.S.2d 891 ).We decline the respondent's request to impose sanctions on the appellant (see generally Swartz v. Swartz, 14......
-
Cullin v. Lynch (In re Lynch)
...A.D.3d 1292, 923 N.Y.S.2d 900;Emco Tech Constr. Corp. v. Pilavas, 68 A.D.3d 918, 918–919, 892 N.Y.S.2d 426;Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Vargas, 288 A.D.2d 309, 310, 732 N.Y.S.2d 891). ...