Matter of Bailey v. Bailey

Decision Date22 February 2005
Docket Number2004-03376.
Citation790 N.Y.S.2d 215,2005 NY Slip Op 01355,15 A.D.3d 577
PartiesIn the Matter of OLIVIA BAILEY, Appellant, v. LEANDO BAILEY, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Parents of minor children are responsible for their children's support until age 21 (see Family Ct Act § 413; Matter of Roe v Doe, 29 NY2d 188, 192-193 [1971]). Nevertheless, children of employable age and in full possession of their faculties who voluntarily and without cause abandon their home, against the will of their parents and for the purpose of avoiding parental control, forfeit their right to demand support even if they are not financially self-sufficient (see Matter of Parker v Stage, 43 NY2d 128 [1977]; Matter of Roe v Doe, supra; Matter of Donnelly v Donnelly, 14 AD3d 811 [2005]; Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. [Jones] v Jones-Gamble, 227 AD2d 618 [1996]). On this record, there was ample evidence to support a finding that the petitioner had abandoned the respondent's home without cause in January 2000, at the age of 17. Accordingly, there is no basis to disturb the findings of the Support Magistrate, who was in the best position to assess the credibility of the witnesses and the evidence offered (see Matter of Heyn v Burr, 6 AD3d 781, 782 [2004]).

H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, S. Miller and Fisher, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Jernigan-Leysath v. Leysath
    • United States
    • New York Family Court
    • May 16, 2022
    ...2022 NY Slip Op 50396(U) In the Matter of a Proceeding for Support Under Article 4 of the Family Court Act, Edward Jernigan-Leysath, ... financially self-sufficient" (Matter of Bailey v ... Bailey, 15 A.D.3d 577 [2d Dept 2005]; Roe, 9 ... N.Y.2d at 192-193; Alice C., 193 ... ...
  • Mark D. v. Brenda D.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 2, 2010
    ...parental control, forfeit their right to demand support even if they are not financially self-sufficient" ( Matter of Bailey v. Bailey, 15 A.D.3d 577, 790 N.Y.S.2d 215 [2005]; Matter of Roe v. Doe, 29 N.Y.2d 188, 192-193, 324 N.Y.S.2d 71, 272 N.E.2d 567 [1971];Matter of Alice C. v. Bernard ......
  • Matter of Baker v. Heaney
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 22, 2005

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT