Matter of Baker v. Baker

• Decision Date: 10 May 2001
• Citation: 724 N.Y.S.2d 131
• Parties: (A.D. 3 Dept. 2001) In the Matter of CRYSTAL L. BAKER, Appellant, v SCOTT M. BAKER, Respondent. 86190 : THIRD JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Page 131

724 N.Y.S.2d 131 (A.D. 3 Dept. 2001)

In the Matter of CRYSTAL L. BAKER, Appellant, v SCOTT M. BAKER, Respondent.

86190

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: THIRD JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

May 10, 2001

John A. Cirando, Syracuse, for appellant.

Lisa A. Proven, Watertown, for respondent.

Alan J. Burczak, Law Guardian, Plattsburgh, for Natasha Baker and another.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ.

Carpinello, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of St. Lawrence County (Harrigan, J.), entered November 5, 1999, which, inter alia, granted respondent's cross petition, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, for modification of a prior order of custody.

Petitioner, mother of Natasha (born in 1995) and Alicia (born in 1996), appeals from a Family Court determination denying her petition for sole custody of the children and granting same to respondent, the girls' father. As our review of the record indicates that Family Court's findings have a sound and substantial basis and serve the best interests of the children, we affirm (see, Matter of Von Dwingelo v Von Dwingelo, 279 A.D.2d 663, 717 N.Y.S.2d 810; Matter of Shaw v Antes, 274 A.D.2d 679, 681; Matter of Ebel v Urlich, 273 A.D.2d 530, 531).

As of the September 1999 hearing in the matter, petitioner was unemployed, receiving public assistance and pregnant with the child of her paramour with whom she was then residing. Her paramour was also unemployed. Additional occupants of their household included her pregnant sister, her sister's husband, the two children who are the subject of these proceedings and numerous pets. In addition, this three bedroom residence was petitioner's sixth in less than 2½ years, many of her prior residences having been described as unkempt and smelling of animal feces. For example, on the occasion of one past prearranged home visit, a probation investigator found her home to be "in dire need of a thorough cleaning".

Testimony also revealed that petitioner suffers from bipolar disease and a borderline personality disorder which manifest themselves in periods of depression and panic attacks. More to the point, however, there was testimony that the children frequently arrived for visitation at respondent's home in a dirty condition. Their hair was typically uncombed and unwashed, they were hungry and wearing dirty, ill-fitting clothing often inappropriate for the season and smelling of urine. The children also suffered from lice and flea bites.

In sharp contrast, as of the hearing, respondent was employed, involved in a stable relationship and he was residing in a residence far more appropriate for the children. Although respondent had a history of problems controlling his temper, this was but one factor to be considered by...