MATTER OF DUBOWY v. City of New York
| Decision Date | 29 May 2003 |
| Citation | 759 N.Y.S.2d 325,305 A.D.2d 320 |
| Parties | In the Matter of EVE DUBOWY, Appellant,<BR>v.<BR>CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
The purpose underlying the notice of claim requirement embodied in General Municipal Law § 50-e, is to protect the municipality from unfounded claims and to ensure that it has an adequate opportunity "to explore the merits of the claim while information is still readily available" (Teresta v City of New York, 304 NY 440, 443 [1952]; see also Camacho v City of New York, 187 AD2d 262, 263 [1992]). The statute, however, is not intended to "operate as a device to defeat the rights of persons with legitimate claims" (Matter of Annis v New York City Tr. Auth., 108 AD2d 643, 644 [1985]).
General Municipal Law § 50-e (5), which confers upon the court the discretion to determine whether to grant or deny leave to serve a late notice of claim (see Matter of Valestil v City of New York, 295 AD2d 619 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 615 [2002]; Matter of Turner v City of New York, 203 AD2d 294, 295 [1994]), is remedial in nature and should, therefore, be liberally construed (Camacho v City of New York, supra at 263; Matter of Santana v City of New York, 183 AD2d 665 [1992]). The key factors which the court must consider in determining if leave should be granted are whether the movant demonstrated a reasonable excuse for the failure to serve the notice of claim within the statutory time frame, whether the municipality acquired actual notice of the essential facts of the claim within 90 days after the claim arose or a reasonable time thereafter, and whether the delay would substantially prejudice the municipality in its defense (Matter of Lodati v City of New York, 303 AD2d 406 [2003]; Matter of Ruiz v New York City Hous. Auth., 272 AD2d 402, 403 [2000]; Braverman v City of White Plains, 115 AD2d 689, 690 [1985]). Moreover, the presence or absence of any one factor is not determinative (Chattergoon v New York City Hous. Auth., 197 AD2d 397, 398 [1993]; Matter of Morris v County of Suffolk, 88 AD2d 956, 957 [1982], affd 58 NY2d 767 [1982]), and the absence of a reasonable excuse is not fatal (Weiss v City of New York, 237 AD2d 212, 213 [1997]; Chattergoon v New York City Hous. Auth., supra at 398; Matter of Gerzel v City of New York, 117 AD2d 549, 551 [1986]).
In the matter at bar, respondent City of New York, in our view, acquired knowledge of the essential facts within a reasonable time after the accident, and failed to demonstrate how the relatively short delay herein resulted in any...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Plaza v. N.Y. Health & Hospitals Corp.
...69 A.D.3d 441, 442, 894 N.Y.S.2d 15 [2010],lv. denied,15 N.Y.3d 711, 2010 WL 4065634 [2010] quoting Matter of Dubowy v. City of New York, 305 A.D.2d 320, 321, 759 N.Y.S.2d 325 [2003] ). As discussed below, in applying these criteria to this case, we find that plaintiff failed to provide a r......
-
Wally G. v.
...Williams v. Nassau County Med. Ctr., 6 N.Y.3d 531, 535, 814 N.Y.S.2d 580, 847 N.E.2d 1154 [2006] and Matter of Dubowy v. City of New York, 305 A.D.2d 320, 321, 759 N.Y.S.2d 325 [2003]; see alsoGML § 50–e[5] ). “[T]he presence or absence of any one factor is not determinative” (Dubowy, 305 A......
-
Corwin v. City of N.Y.
...Hosps. Corp. [Jacobi Med. Ctr.], 69 A.D.3d 441, 442, 894 N.Y.S.2d 15 [1st Dept.2010], quoting Matter of Dubowy v. City of New York, 305 A.D.2d 320, 321, 759 N.Y.S.2d 325 [1st Dept.2003], lv. denied 15 N.Y.3d 711, 2010 WL 4065634 [2010] ). The presence or absence of any one factor is not det......
-
Requena v. The N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.
... 2023 NY Slip Op 34493(U) ROSALYN REQUENA, Petitioner, v. THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, THE NEW YORK CITY ... and the absence of a reasonable excuse is ... not fatal." (Dubowy v. City of New York, 305 ... A.D.2d 320, 321, 759 N.Y.S.2d 325 [1st Dept 2003] ... internal citations omitted', see Matter of ... Morris, 88 A.D.2d 956, 957, 451 N.Y.S.2d 448 [2d Dept ... 1982], ... ...