MATTER OF ELIA v. Elia

Decision Date04 November 2002
PartiesIn the Matter of ALTAGRACE ELIA, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>ROBERT ELIA, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Smith, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Crane, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The father's contention that the mother failed to show a change in circumstances warranting an upward modification of child support is unpreserved for appellate review, as that issue was not raised before the hearing examiner or in the objections before the Family Court (see Matter of Coleman v Thomas, 295 AD2d 508). In any event, the mother successfully demonstrated a change in circumstances by setting forth specific increased expenses of the two subject children (see Family Ct Act § 461 [b] [ii]; Matter of Michaels v Michaels, 56 NY2d 924, 926; Matter of Staffanell v Staffanell, 220 AD2d 751). Furthermore, the court correctly applied the Child Support Standards Act formula in arriving at the amount of the upward modification, as application of that formula is mandatory (see Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [c]; Bast v Rossoff, 91 NY2d 723, 728; Matter of Thomas v DeFalco, 270 AD2d 277, 278; Matter of Alice C. v Bernard G.C., 193 AD2d 97, 111).

The father's remaining contentions are without merit.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Hall v. Pancho
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 5, 2017
    ...in her objections before the Family Court (see Matter of Best v. Hinds, 113 A.D.3d 676, 677, 978 N.Y.S.2d 688 ; Matter of Elia v. Elia, 299 A.D.2d 358, 749 N.Y.S.2d 176 ). Similarly, the mother's contention that the Support Magistrate erred in failing to make a cost of living adjustment is ......
  • In the Matter of Christine Scarduzio v. Ryan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 12, 2011
    ...see Matter of Ryan v. Levine, 80 A.D.3d 767, 916 N.Y.S.2d 780; McMahon v. McMahon, 19 A.D.3d 464, 798 N.Y.S.2d 446; Matter of Elia v. Elia, 299 A.D.2d 358, 749 N.Y.S.2d 176). Pursuant to Family Court Act § 413(1)(c)(4), “where the custodial parent is working ... and incurs child care expens......
  • O'Gorman v. O'Gorman
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 12, 2014
    ...Matter of Ryan v. Levine, 80 A.D.3d 767, 916 N.Y.S.2d 780 ; McMahon v. McMahon, 19 A.D.3d 464, 798 N.Y.S.2d 446 ; Matter of Elia v. Elia, 299 A.D.2d 358, 358, 749 N.Y.S.2d 176 ; Matter of Staffanell v. Staffanell, 220 A.D.2d 751, 751–752, 633 N.Y.S.2d 74 ). Further, under the circumstances ......
  • O'Gorman v. O'Gorman
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 12, 2014
    ...Matter of Ryan v. Levine, 80 A.D.3d 767, 916 N.Y.S.2d 780; McMahon v. McMahon, 19 A.D.3d 464, 798 N.Y.S.2d 446; Matter of Elia v. Elia, 299 A.D.2d 358, 358, 749 N.Y.S.2d 176; Matter of Staffanell v. Staffanell, 220 A.D.2d 751, 751–752, 633 N.Y.S.2d 74). Further, under the circumstances of t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT