Matter of Finell v. Finell, 2004-09887.
Decision Date | 24 January 2006 |
Docket Number | 2004-09887.,2004-09890.,2005-00674.,2004-09889.,2004-09888. |
Citation | 25 A.D.3d 703,811 N.Y.S.2d 733,2006 NY Slip Op 00515 |
Parties | In the Matter of JUDITH FINELL, Respondent, v. STEVEN FINELL, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order dated December 14, 2004, is reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, the objections are sustained, and the amended order dated September 27, 2004, is vacated.
The father's argument that he should be relieved of his obligation to pay additional child support to the mother because he made various expenditures for the benefit of his children at the mother's request is without merit. "Voluntary payments made by a parent for the benefit of his or her children and not pursuant to a court order may not be credited against amounts due under the order" (Matter of Gleason v Gleason, 247 AD2d 384, 385 [1998]; see Horne v Horne, 22 NY2d 219, 224 [1968]; Mayeri v Mayeri, 220 AD2d...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Horn v. Horn
...Groesbeck, 117 A.D.3d 810, 811, 985 N.Y.S.2d 686 ; LiGreci v. LiGreci, 87 A.D.3d 722, 724, 929 N.Y.S.2d 253 ; Matter of Finell v. Finell, 25 A.D.3d 703, 704, 811 N.Y.S.2d 733 ). Furthermore, the defendant does not dispute that he did not make the full payments as required under the December......
-
Ligreci v. Ligreci
...224, 292 N.Y.S.2d 411, 239 N.E.2d 348; Matter of Hang Kwok v. Xiao Yan Zhang, 35 A.D.3d 467, 824 N.Y.S.2d 727; Matter of Finell v. Finell, 25 A.D.3d 703, 811 N.Y.S.2d 733; Matter of Gleason v. Gleason, 247 A.D.2d 384, 668 N.Y.S.2d 657; Lefkow v. Lefkow, 188 A.D.2d 589, 591 N.Y.S.2d 488; Sol......
-
Felix v. Felix
...47 A.D.3d 936, 937, 850 N.Y.S.2d 588;Matter of Musarra v. Musarra, 28 A.D.3d 668, 669, 814 N.Y.S.2d 657;Matter of Finell v. Finell, 25 A.D.3d 703, 704, 811 N.Y.S.2d 733;Giuffrida v. Giuffrida, 81 A.D.2d 905, 906, 439 N.Y.S.2d 398). “Further, the merits of the parties' positions are relevant......
-
McKay v. Groesbeck
...22 N.Y.2d 219, 224, 292 N.Y.S.2d 411, 239 N.E.2d 348;LiGreci v. LiGreci, 87 A.D.3d 722, 724, 929 N.Y.S.2d 253;Matter of Finell v. Finell, 25 A.D.3d 703, 704, 811 N.Y.S.2d 733;Lefkow v. Lefkow, 188 A.D.2d 589, 591 N.Y.S.2d 488). Further, a party is not entitled to a credit for payments made ......