Matter of Flood v. Flood
Decision Date | 04 June 2009 |
Docket Number | 503527. |
Citation | 63 A.D.3d 1197,880 N.Y.S.2d 748,2009 NY Slip Op 04309 |
Parties | In the Matter of MICHAEL P. FLOOD, Respondent, v. JANET F. FLOOD, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Appeal from a corrected order of the Family Court of Albany County (Walsh, J.), entered September 7, 2007, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, to modify a prior order of visitation.
Under the parties' 2005 divorce decree, respondent (hereinafter the mother) was awarded sole legal and physical custody of their two daughters (born in 1996 and 1999). Petitioner (hereinafter the father) was granted telephone access at least once every 60 days and unlimited contact by mail. No visitation was awarded, mainly due to the father's incarceration for his conviction of robbery in the first degree, with his earliest possible release date occurring in 2014. In 2006, the father commenced this proceeding seeking monthly in-person visitation with his children. Following a hearing, Family Court granted the father four visits per year with both daughters. The mother appeals.
Visitation decisions are generally left to Family Court's sound discretion, requiring reversal only where the decision lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Roe v Roe, 33 AD3d 1152, 1155 [2006]). Here, the father wrote to his children almost weekly from prison, called when permitted by the mother and the prison, and had regularly cared for the children prior to his incarceration. The father was transferred from Attica Correctional Facility in Wyoming County to Coxsackie Correctional Facility in Greene County. While Attica is a considerable distance from the mother's home in Albany County, Coxsackie is approximately 30 miles away. This new location greatly reduced the transportation time and expenses associated with visitation. Considering the father's extensive involvement in the children's lives both before and after incarceration, coupled with his new close proximity to the children, he established a change in circumstances (cf. Matter of Conklin v Hernandez, 41 AD3d 908, 911 [2007]).
With a change in circumstances having been established, Family Court was then required to conduct a best interests analysis (see Matter of Kerwin v Kerwin, 39 AD3d 950, 951 [2007]). "[T]he best interests of children generally lie with a meaningful relationship with both parents" (Tait v Tait, 44 AD3d 1142, 1143 [2007]). Visitation with a noncustodial parent is presumed to be in the children's best interests, although the presumption can be overcome with evidence that visitation would be detrimental to the children's welfare (see Matter of Tanner v Tanner, 35 AD3d 1102, 1103 [2006]; Matter of Frierson v Goldston, 9 AD3d 612, 614 [2004]). A parent's incarceration, by itself, does not vitiate this presumption (see Matter of Albanese v Albanese, 44 AD3d 1117, 1120 [2007]; Matter of Tanner v Tanner, 35 AD3d at 1103; Matter of McCrone v Parker, 265 AD2d 757, 757-758 [1999]). The father, who was the only witness at the hearing, testified that he regularly cared for the children before his incarceration, called when permitted by the prison and the mother, wrote the children letters almost weekly, and his relatives were willing to assist with transportation or reimburse the mother for the cost of transporting the children to visits. The father took steps while in prison to improve his life, including being elected chair of his Alcoholics Anonymous group, regularly attending Narcotics Anonymous to address the addiction which led to his incarceration, working in various prison jobs and attending the chapel program. The mother brought the children to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lorimer v. Lorimer
...690, 903 N.Y.S.2d 827 [2010] [children aged 13, 12 and 10 were "certainly old enough to provide insight"]; Matter of Flood v. Flood , 63 A.D.3d 1197, 1199, 880 N.Y.S.2d 748 [2009] [information about wishes of 10 year old and 7 year old "would have been helpful to the court's determination o......
-
Yeager v. Yeager
...110 A.D.3d 1207973 N.Y.S.2d 3812013 N.Y. Slip Op. 06762In the Matter of Shelly YEAGER, Appellant,v.Michael YEAGER, Respondent.(And Another Related Proceeding.)Supreme ... we conclude that a Lincoln hearing is called for under the circumstances here ( see Matter of Flood v. Flood, 63 A.D.3d 1197, 1199, 880 N.Y.S.2d 748 [2009] ), we must remit the modification petition ... ...
-
Larussa v. Williams
...114 A.D.3d 1052980 N.Y.S.2d 6052014 N.Y. Slip Op. 01226In the Matter of Leena LaRUSSA, Respondent,v.Tshombe WILLIAMS, Appellant.Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third ... Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 171, 451 N.Y.S.2d 658, 436 N.E.2d 1260 [1982];Matter of Flood v. Flood, 63 A.D.3d 1197, 1198, 880 N.Y.S.2d 748 [2009] ). In this regard, we agree with the father ... ...
-
David J. v. Leeann K.
...140 A.D.3d 120932 N.Y.S.3d 6862016 N.Y. Slip Op. 04260In the Matter of DAVID J., Respondent,v.LEEANN K., Appellant.Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, ... Diana TT., 127 A.D.3d 1514, 1515, 7 N.Y.S.3d 706 [2015] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Flood v. Flood, 63 A.D.3d 1197, 1198, 880 N.Y.S.2d 748 [2009] ).Family Court made an express finding that ... ...