Matter of Fontani v. Hershowitz, 2003-08613.

Decision Date29 November 2004
Docket Number2003-08613.
PartiesIn the Matter of LEONARD FONTANI, Appellant, v. JOSEPH HERSHOWITZ, Also Known as JOSEPH GHERSHOWITZ et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, in effect, to review an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 7, 2002, dismissing, on the ground of res judicata, an earlier action the petitioner had commenced against the same respondents. The Supreme Court properly dismissed this proceeding on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action upon which CPLR article 78 relief could be granted. Writs of mandamus, prohibition, and certiorari do not lie to review an appealable order or to correct an alleged error of law (see Matter of Branciforte v Spanish Naturopath Socy., 217 AD2d 619 [1995]). The proper remedy, if one is aggrieved by the order of a court, is to take an appeal from the final order or judgment (see Matter of Veloz v Rothwax, 65 NY2d 902 [1985]; Matter of Branciforte v Spanish Naturopath Socy., supra; Matter of Sommer v Harrington, 198 AD2d 508 [1993]).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Ram v. Torto
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 20, 2013
    ...88 A.D.3d 891, 931 N.Y.S.2d 103; Matter of Ram v. Hershowitz, 76 A.D.3d 1022, 908 N.Y.S.2d 106; Matter of Fontani v. Hershowitz, 12 A.D.3d 672, 784 N.Y.S.2d 890; Matter of Fontani v. Hershowitz, 12 A.D.3d 636, 784 N.Y.S.2d 903). However, the plaintiff has continued in his attempts to re-lit......
  • Garcia v. Garcia
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 20, 2013
    ...to renewal upon compliance with the applicable requirements” [961 N.Y.S.2d 519](Matter of Fischer–Holland v. Walker, 12 A.D.3d 671, 672, 784 N.Y.S.2d 890;see22 NYCRR 202.16[k][2], [5][ii] ). Contrary to the defendant's contention, there was no language in the stipulation of settlement exemp......
  • Ram v. Estate of Hershowitz
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 19, 2017
    ...88 A.D.3d 891, 931 N.Y.S.2d 103 ; Matter of Ram v. Hershowitz, 76 A.D.3d 1022, 908 N.Y.S.2d 106 ; Matter of Fontani v. Hershowitz, 12 A.D.3d 672, 784 N.Y.S.2d 890 ; Fontani v. Hershowitz, 12 A.D.3d 636, 784 N.Y.S.2d 903 ). However, as previously stated by this Court, the petitioner has cont......
  • Ram v. Hershowitz
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 21, 2010
    ...by Hershowitz. Orders dismissing two such proceedings were affirmed by this Court on appeals ( see Matter of Fontani v. Hershowitz, 12 A.D.3d 672, 784 N.Y.S.2d 890; Fontani v. Hershowitz, 12 A.D.3d 636, 784 N.Y.S.2d 903). Subsequent to those appeals, the petitioner commenced another enforce......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT