Matter of Haberman v. Zoning Board of Appeals of City of Long Beach
Decision Date | 01 July 2008 |
Docket Number | No. 2004-05680,2004-05680 |
Parties | In the Matter of SINCLAIR HABERMAN et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF CITY OF LONG BEACH et al., Respondents-Appellants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
from, denied the petition, dismissed the proceeding on the merits, dismissed the complaint except the fourth cause of action insofar as asserted against the City of Long Beach, confirmed the determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Long Beach, remitted the matter to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for the entry of a judgment declaring that the petitioners/plaintiffs were not entitled to the building permit issued on August 12, 2003 and, further, dismissed the appeal as academic in light of our determination on the cross appeals (see Matter of Haberman v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of Long Beach, 35 AD3d 465 [2006]). In an opinion dated November 19, 2007 the Court of Appeals reversed the decision and order of this Court insofar as appealed from, held that the attorney for the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Long Beach had the authority to extend the time to apply for building permits as set forth in a stipulation of settlement dated March 8, 1989 and remitted the matter to this Court for consideration of the issues raised but not determined previously by this Court (see Matter of Haberman v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of Long Beach, 9 NY3d 269 [2007]). Justices Carni and Balkin have been substituted for Justices Adams and Lunn (see 22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, (1) by deleting the provision thereof, in effect, denying that branch of the motion of the City of Long Beach which was to dismiss the sixth cause of action, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion, and (2) by deleting the provision thereof annulling the determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Long Beach which revoked the building permit previously issued on August 12, 2003 and remitting the matter to the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Long Beach, and substituting therefor a provision permitting the respondents/defendants to interpose an answer to the combined petition and complaint; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.
In August 1989, pursuant to a stipulation of settlement dated March 8, 1989 (hereinafter the stipulation) setting forth certain obligations to be fulfilled by ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Terry v. Incorporated Village of Patchogue, 2009 NY Slip Op 30941 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 4/26/2009)
...in causes of action one through nine are dismissed as against the moving Defendants only (see, Haberman v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of Long Beach, 53 A.D.3d 490, 861 N.Y.S.2d 745). The tenth cause of action also alleges that it sounds in "fraud" and but it states that it was brought fo......
-
Haberman v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of Long Beach
...of those branches of the motions which were to dismiss the remaining causes of action ( see Matter of Haberman v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of Long Beach, 53 A.D.3d 490, 493, 861 N.Y.S.2d 745). Upon remittal to the Supreme Court, the plaintiffs were granted leave to amend the petition/c......
-
Haberman v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of Long Beach
...to permit the respondents/defendants to interpose an answer to the petition/complaint ( see Matter of Haberman v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of Long Beach, 53 A.D.3d 490, 861 N.Y.S.2d 745). While its September 2003 petition to the ZBA was still pending, Xander commenced a related proceed......
- In the Matter of Kelly A. Maida v. Capraro