MATTER OF HUFF

Decision Date01 February 2001
Docket NumberNo. 532P00.,532P00.
Citation353 N.C. 374,547 S.E.2d 9
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesIn the Matter of X. HUFF.

Alton D. Bain, Lillington, for Tampatha Huff.

Richard E. Jester, Angier, for James J. Huff.

E. Marshall Woodall, Lillington, for Harnett County DSS.

Prior report: 140 N.C.App. 288, 536 S.E.2d 838.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Respondent (James J. Huff) in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of February 2001."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent (James J. Huff) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of February 2001."

Justice EDMUNDS recused.

To continue reading

Request your trial
228 cases
  • In re K.J.L.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 16 Diciembre 2008
    ...238, 615 S.E.2d 26, 32 (2005) (citing In re Huff, 140 N.C.App. 288, 291, 536 S.E.2d 838, 840 (2000), disc. review denied, 353 N.C. 374, 547 S.E.2d 9, 10 (2001)). A "neglected juvenile" is defined in N.C. Gen.Stat. § 7B-101(15) A juvenile who does not receive proper care, supervision, or dis......
  • In re A.B.D.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 6 Septiembre 2005
    ... ... Code are civil in nature, and accordingly, `proceedings in juvenile matters are to be governed by the Rules of Civil Procedure.'") (quoting Matter of Bullabough, 89 N.C.App. 171, 179, 365 S.E.2d 642, 646 (1988)); In re Brown, 141 N.C.App. 550, 551, 539 S.E.2d 366, 368 (2000), cert. denied, ... ...
  • In re J.B.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 2 Agosto 2005
    ...not determinative of the ultimate issue. In re Huff, 140 N.C.App. 288, 300, 536 S.E.2d 838, 846 (2000), disc. review denied, 353 N.C. 374, 547 S.E.2d 9 (2001); In re Beck, 109 N.C.App. 539, 545, 428 S.E.2d 232, 236 In the instant case, the trial court allowed petitioner to introduce into ev......
  • In re J.D.S.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 17 Mayo 2005
    ...In re Allred, 122 N.C.App. 561, 565, 471 S.E.2d 84, 86 (1996) (citation omitted)), disc. rev. denied and appeal dismissed, 353 N.C. 374, 547 S.E.2d 9 (2001). We review the trial court's conclusions of law de novo. Scott v. Scott, 157 N.C.App. 382, 385, 579 S.E.2d 431, 433 (2003) (trial cour......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT