Matter of Kale F.
| Decision Date | 16 February 2000 |
| Citation | 703 N.Y.S.2d 783,269 A.D.2d 832 |
| Parties | In the Matter of KALE F., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.<BR>STEUBEN COUNTY ATTORNEY, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Present — Wisner, J. P., Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ.
Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs.
Respondent appeals from an order of disposition that placed him in the custody of the Steuben County Department of Social Services for a 14-month period, until August 30, 1999. That order expired and the appeal is moot (see, Matter of Michael OO., 267 AD2d 638; Matter of Alice P., 254 AD2d 770). This appeal fails to satisfy the "three critical conditions to the mootness exception" (Matter of Chenier v Richard W., 82 NY2d 830, 832; see also, Mental Hygiene Legal Servs. v Ford, 92 NY2d 500, 505-506; but see, Matter of Jennifer B., 256 AD2d 1195), and there is no indication in the record that respondent is still being affected by that order (see, Matter of Chenier v Richard W., supra, at 832). Consequently, we dismiss the appeal.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Sysamouth D.
...98 A.D.3d 1314951 N.Y.S.2d 4242012 N.Y. Slip Op. 06482In the Matter of SYSAMOUTH D., RespondentAppellant.Oneida County Attorney, PetitionerRespondent.Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New ... Respondent's contentions with respect to placement do not fall within the exception to the mootness doctrine ( see Matter of Kale F., 269 A.D.2d 832, 703 N.Y.S.2d 783;see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 714715, 431 N.Y.S.2d 400, 409 N.E.2d 876) ... ...
-
Alvin H. v. Onondaga Cnty. Attorney
...167 N.Y.S.3d 885 (Mem)In the Matter of ALVIN H., Respondent-Appellant.v.ONONDAGA COUNTY ATTORNEY, Petitioner-Respondent.535CAF 21-01146Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth ... , 98 A.D.3d 1314, 1314, 951 N.Y.S.2d 424 [4th Dept. 2012] ; Matter of Kale F. , 269 A.D.2d 832, 832-833, 703 N.Y.S.2d 783 [4th Dept. 2000] ) and, to the extent that the order on appeal has been superceded by a subsequent ... ...
- MATTER OF EMERY v. Bond
-
In re Lenores S.M.
...125 A.D.3d 1520999 N.Y.S.2d 920 (Mem)2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 01355In the Matter of LENORES S.M., RespondentAppellant.Wayne County Attorney, PetitionerRespondent.Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.Feb ... to the mootness doctrine does not apply (see Matter of Sysamouth D., 98 A.D.3d 1314, 1314, 951 N.Y.S.2d 424 ; 999 N.Y.S.2d 921Matter of Kale F., 269 A.D.2d 832, 833, 703 N.Y.S.2d 783 ; see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 714715, 431 N.Y.S.2d 400, 409 N.E.2d 876 ... ...