Matter of Lazzari v. Town of Eastchester

Decision Date26 May 2009
Docket Number2008-08313.
Citation878 N.Y.S.2d 904,2009 NY Slip Op 04239,62 A.D.3d 1002
PartiesIn the Matter of RICHARD LAZZARI, Respondent, v. TOWN OF EASTCHESTER et al., Appellants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for the joinder of the Westchester County Department of Human Resources as a respondent in this proceeding, without prejudice to its right to assert any defenses or affirmative defenses, the service of the notice of petition and petition by the petitioner upon the Westchester County Department of Human Resources within 30 days after service upon him of a copy of this decision and order, the service by the Westchester County Department of Human Resources of an answer or motion directed to the petition, and a new determination thereafter of the petition, in accordance herewith.

Under the circumstances presented, we agree with the appellants that the Westchester County Department of Human Resources (hereinafter the County DHR) is a necessary party to this proceeding (CPLR 1001 [a]), and the Supreme Court should have ordered it joined (CPLR 1001 [b]). Accordingly, the County DHR must be joined as a respondent without prejudice to its right to assert any defenses or affirmative defenses and the petitioner must serve the notice of petition and petition upon it within 30 days after service upon him of a copy of this decision and order (see Windy Ridge Farm v Assessor of Town of Shandaken, 11 NY3d 725, 727 [2008]; Matter of Romeo v New York State Dept. of Educ., 41 AD3d 1102, 1105 [2007]). Thus, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for a new determination of the petition, with the participation of the County DHR.

PRUDENTI, P.J., MILLER, ENG and BELEN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Saint James Antiochian Orthodox Church v. Town of Hyde Park Planning Bd.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 7, 2015
  • Germain v. Town of Chester Planning Bd.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 6, 2017
    ...of Mega Sound & Light, LLC v. Commissioner of Labor, 99 A.D.3d 800, 800, 952 N.Y.S.2d 210 ; Matter of Lazzari v. Town of Eastchester, 62 A.D.3d 1002, 1002–1003, 878 N.Y.S.2d 904 ; see also Matter of Greens at Half Hollow, LLC v. Suffolk County Dept. of Pub. Works, 147 A.D.3d 942, 943–944 ).......
  • Hejna v. Planning Bd. of Vill. of Amityville
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 10, 2013
    ...a rational basis, and was not illegal, arbitrary and capricious, or an abuse of discretion ( see generally Matter of Kearney v. Kita, 62 A.D.3d at 1002, 879 N.Y.S.2d 584). The petitioners' remaining contention need not be reached. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition ......
  • Mega Sound & Light, LLC v. Comm'r of Labor
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 10, 2012
    ...v. Assessor of Town of Shandaken, 11 N.Y.3d 725, 726–727, 864 N.Y.S.2d 794, 894 N.E.2d 1183;Matter of Lazzari v. Town of Eastchester, 62 A.D.3d 1002, 1002–1003, 878 N.Y.S.2d 904,lv. granted17 N.Y.3d 718, 936 N.Y.S.2d 75, 959 N.E.2d 1024;Matter of Romeo v. New York State Dept. of Educ., 41 A......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT