MATTER OF LOZADA v. Lozada
| Decision Date | 20 March 2000 |
| Citation | 270 A.D.2d 422,704 N.Y.S.2d 313 |
| Parties | In the Matter of CARLOS LOZADA, Appellant,<BR>v.<BR>FRANCES LOZADA, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The father has been incarcerated since 1977 on a conviction for murder in the second degree upon which a sentence of 25 years to life was imposed. Over the years, the children participated in numerous weekend trailer visits with him at the prison, but those visits ceased in 1994 after the parties' divorce. The mother testified that the father threatened the children that he would kill them and her if they did not visit him, wrote intimidating letters to them, and caused them to become distressed when he spoke to them by telephone.
The Family Court's order directing visitation of six days per year, or more if proper arrangements could be made, is supported by the record. Under the circumstances, such a determination was in the best interests of the children (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167). The Family Court gave proper weight to the children's wishes which, although not controlling, must be considered, particularly where, as here, the children are of sufficient age to articulate their needs and preferences to the court (see, Matter of Kilstein v MacDowell, 226 AD2d 727; Koppenhoefer v Koppenhoefer, 159 AD2d 113).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Erica S.
...v. Krasner, 94 A.D.3d 763, 764, 942 N.Y.S.2d 125; Matter of Murphy v. Diem, 74 A.D.3d 814, 902 N.Y.S.2d 157; Matter of Lozada v. Lozada, 270 A.D.2d 422, 704 N.Y.S.2d 313; Matter of Licitra v. Licitra, 255 A.D.2d 384, 679 N.Y.S.2d ...
-
L.R. v. C.R.
...Both children have reached an age where they are capable of articulating their needs and preferences to the Court. See Lozada v. Lozada, 270 A.D.2d 422 (2d Dept.2000). Accordingly, the views of the children have weighed heavily in this Court's decision.The Forensic Evaluator.Based upon the ......
-
Golda v. Radtke
...where, as here, the children are of sufficient age to articulate their needs and preferences to the court” ( Matter of Lozada v. Lozada, 270 A.D.2d 422, 422, 704 N.Y.S.2d 313). It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed insofar as it concerns the oldest child of petition......
- MATTER OF MILHOLLEN v. Voelpel