Matter of Matthew E. v. Erie County Department of Social Services

Decision Date08 June 2007
Docket NumberCAF 06-02372.
Citation2007 NY Slip Op 04983,839 N.Y.S.2d 871,41 A.D.3d 1240
PartiesIn the Matter of MATTHEW E., Respondent, v. ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent. LAWRENCE F. KORZENIEWSKI, ESQ., Law Guardian, Appellant. In the Matter of MATTHEW E., Respondent, v. IAN M., Respondent. LAWRENCE F. KORZENIEWSKI, ESQ., Law Guardian, Appellant. In the Matter of MATTHEW E., Respondent, v. CHELSEA E., Respondent. LAWRENCE F. KORZENIEWSKI, ESQ., Law Guardian, Appellant. In the Matter of MICHAEL O. et al., Respondents, v. ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent. LAWRENCE F. KORZENIEWSKI, ESQ., Law Guardian, Appellant. In the Matter of MICHAEL O. et al., Respondents, v. CHELSEA E., Respondent. LAWRENCE F. KORZENIEWSKI, ESQ., Law Guardian, Appellant. In the Matter of MICHAEL O. et al., Respondents, v. IAN M., Respondent. LAWRENCE F. KORZENIEWSKI, ESQ., Law Guardian, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Patricia A. Maxwell, J.), entered August 3, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order granted the petitions for custody of petitioner Matthew E. and dismissed the petitions for custody of petitioners Michael O. and Yvonne O. with prejudice.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by dismissing the petitions of petitioner Matthew E. and by providing that the petitions of petitioners Michael O. and Yvonne O. are dismissed without prejudice and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the Law Guardian appeals from an order granting the petitions of Matthew E. seeking custody of his grandchild and dismissing the custody petitions of the child's foster parents. We agree with the Law Guardian that Family Court erred in granting the grandfather's petitions for custody of the child and erred in dismissing the foster parents' petitions for custody with prejudice, and we therefore modify the order accordingly.

With respect to the grandfather's petitions, we conclude that the court erred in failing to make an initial determination with respect to the existence of extraordinary circumstances before reaching the issue of the best interests of the child (see Matter of Gary G. v Roslyn P., 248 AD2d 980, 981 [1998]; Matter of Michael G.B. v Angela L.B., 219 AD2d 289, 291 [1996]). We further conclude that, although custody determinations generally are accorded great deference (see Matter of Carl G. v Oneida County Dept. of Social Servs., 24 AD3d 1274, 1275 [2005]), the court in this case abused its discretion in determining that it is in the child's best interests to award custody to the grandfather (see generally Matter of Donald W., 17 AD3d 728, 729-730 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 705 [2005]; Matter of Tiffany Malika B., 215 AD2d 200, 201 [1995], lv denied 86...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Sandy L.S. v. Onondaga Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 20, 2020
    ...child does not have ‘a greater right to custody’ than the child's foster parents" ( Matter of Matthew E. v. Erie County Dept. of Social Servs. , 41 A.D.3d 1240, 1241, 839 N.Y.S.2d 871 [4th Dept. 2007] ; see Matter of Gordon B.B. , 30 A.D.3d 1005, 1006, 818 N.Y.S.2d 692 [4th Dept. 2006] ; se......
  • In re Lundyn S.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 1, 2015
    ...of the child does not have ‘a greater right to custody’ than the child's foster parents” (Matter of Matthew E. v. Erie County Dept. of Social Servs., 41 A.D.3d 1240, 1241, 839 N.Y.S.2d 871 ). Furthermore, contrary to the father's contention, the child's “blood relative does not take precede......
  • Charles V. v. Vivian N.V. (In re Angellynn S.H.W.)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 23, 2012
    ...[do] not have ‘a greater right to custody’ than the child's foster parents” ( Matter of Matthew E. v. Erie County Dept. of Social Servs., 41 A.D.3d 1240, 1241, 839 N.Y.S.2d 871; see Matter of Gordon B.B., 30 A.D.3d 1005, 1006, 818 N.Y.S.2d 692; see generally Matter of Thurston v. Skellingto......
  • In re Lundyn S.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 10, 2016
    ...of the child does not have ‘a greater right to custody’ than the child's foster parents” (Matter of Matthew E. v. Erie County Dept. of Social Servs., 41 A.D.3d 1240, 1241, 839 N.Y.S.2d 871 ; see Matter of Gordon B.B., 30 A.D.3d 1005, 1006, 818 N.Y.S.2d 692 ; see generally Matter of Thurston......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT