Matter of Miller v. Smith, 2003-07290.
Decision Date | 10 May 2004 |
Docket Number | 2003-07292.,2003-07290. |
Citation | 775 N.Y.S.2d 900,7 A.D.3d 629,2004 NY Slip Op 03824 |
Parties | IN THE MATTER OF LISA MILLER, Respondent, v. JONATHAN SMITH, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the mother.
Family Court Act § 439 (e) provides that an aggrieved party's specific written objections to the final order of support of the Hearing Examiner must be submitted within 35 days after the mailing of the order to such party. The Hearing Examiner's order was mailed to the father on June 14, 2002. However, the father did not submit written objections to the Hearing Examiner's order until July 22, 2002. Since the father's written objections were not submitted until more than 35 days after the mailing of the Hearing Examiner's order, the Family Court properly denied the objections on this ground (see Matter of Zullo v Hom, 1 AD3d 442 [2003]; Matter of Mayeri v Mayeri, 279 AD2d 473 [2001]). The father's contention on appeal regarding the date of mailing is based on matter dehors the record.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ma v. Washington
...to the objecting party ( seeFamily Ct. Act § 439[e]; Matter of Hodges v. Hodges, 40 A.D.3d 639, 833 N.Y.S.2d 396; Matter of Miller v. Smith, 7 A.D.3d 629, 775 N.Y.S.2d 900; Matter of Mayeri v. Mayeri, 279 A.D.2d 473, 719 N.Y.S.2d 582). Here, since the father did not timely file written obje......
- Matter of New York Central Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Hall