Matter of Najee A., 7897.

Citation809 N.Y.S.2d 80,26 A.D.3d 258,2006 NY Slip Op 01259
Decision Date21 February 2006
Docket Number7897.
PartiesIn the Matter of NAJEE A., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

The court's finding as to sexual abuse and forcible touching was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning credibility. The sexual gratification element could be readily inferred from appellant's conduct, which included rubbing his clothed penis against the victim's buttocks while attempting to pull down the victim's pants (see e.g. Matter of Stephen F., 300 AD2d 52 [2002]; Matter of Joel H., 279 AD2d 266 [2001]). The court properly rejected appellant's claim that the incident was merely a playful wrestling match.

As the presentment agency concedes, appellant is entitled to dismissal of the unlawful imprisonment count based upon the merger doctrine.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Nardelli and Malone, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • People v. Bautista
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 23, 2017
    ...105, 952 N.E.2d 1100 [2011] ; cf. Matter of Michael DD., 33 A.D.3d 1185, 1185–1186, 823 N.Y.S.2d 284 [2006] ; Matter of Najee A., 26 A.D.3d 258, 258–259, 809 N.Y.S.2d 80 [2006], lv. denied 7 N.Y.3d 703, 819 N.Y.S.2d 870, 853 N.E.2d 241 [2006] ).Defendant asserts that certain inconsistencies......
  • Bate v. City of N.Y.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • September 29, 2018
    ...sexual desire can be inferred from the circumstances of the conduct." Romeo,385 F. App'x at 49 (citations omitted); In re Najee A., 26 A.D.3d 258, 258-59 (1st Dept. 2006) ("The sexual gratification element could be readily inferred from appellant's conduct."); see also People v. Teicher, 52......
  • In re Southern
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 17, 2013
    ...the complaining witness, support the inference that he acted for the purpose of sexual gratification ( see e.g. Matter of Najee A., 26 A.D.3d 258, 809 N.Y.S.2d 80 [1st Dept.2006], lv.denied7 N.Y.3d 703, 819 N.Y.S.2d 870, 853 N.E.2d 241 [2006];Matter of Kenny O., 276 A.D.2d 271, 714 N.Y.S.2d......
  • In re Juan P.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 11, 2014
    ...recommendations made in the probation report” (Matter of Thomas, 50 A.D.3d at 898, 857 N.Y.S.2d 583;see also Matter of Najee A., 26 A.D.3d 258, 809 N.Y.S.2d 80 [1st Dept. 2006], lv. denied7 N.Y.3d 703, 819 N.Y.S.2d 870, 853 N.E.2d 241 [2006] [probation appropriate where appellant engaged in......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT