MATTER OF TUNG C.

Decision Date02 July 2002
Citation296 A.D.2d 323,744 N.Y.S.2d 671
PartiesIn the Matter of YUAN TUNG C., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Appellant's challenge to the court's dispositional order is moot because that order expired in 1996 (see, Matter of Christopher H., 198 AD2d 120; Matter of Darryl G., 184 AD2d 204), and there is no basis upon which to review the order notwithstanding its mootness. In any event, the dispositional order was a proper exercise of discretion see, Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2] [a]).

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • In re Tyshawn M.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 28, 2017
    ...challenge to the court's dispositional order is moot because he has already completed his placement (see Matter of Yuan Tung C., 296 A.D.2d 323, 323, 744 N.Y.S.2d 671 [1st Dept.2002] ). In any event, the disposition was a provident exercise of discretion. TOM, J.P., FRIEDMAN, ANDRIAS, GESME......
  • In re Ramzy F.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 21, 2010
    ...challenge to the court's dispositional order is moot, since he has already completed his placement ( see Matter of Yuan Tung C., 296 A.D.2d 323, 744 N.Y.S.2d 671 [2002] ). Were we not dismissing the appeal as moot, we would find that the placement was a proper exercise of discretion. TOM, J......
  • Melohn v. R&M COMBUSTION CO., INC.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 2, 2002

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT