Matter of Volunteers of America-Greater New York, Inc. v. Almonte
Decision Date | 15 September 2009 |
Docket Number | 2008-00786. |
Citation | 886 N.Y.S.2d 46,65 A.D.3d 1155,2009 NY Slip Op 06560 |
Parties | In the Matter of VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA-GREATER NEW YORK, INC., Appellant, v. MANUEL ALMONTE, Respondent, et al., Respondent. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The City of New York owns the building in which the subject premises are located. The Department of Homeless Services (hereinafter the DHS) operates the building as a single room occupancy (hereinafter SRO) facility, providing SRO units to 174 homeless adults. The DHS has designated 53 of the units for persons with a history of mental illness. The tenant of the subject premises (hereinafter the tenant), who has been classified as "persistently mentally ill," has resided at the subject premises for over 10 years.
In May 2004, the DHS contracted with the petitioner to operate the building and provide its residents with support services "to foster [each resident's] ability to live independently in permanent housing." The contract between the DHS and the petitioner designates, among other things, the amount of rent each tenant will pay, when the petitioner is to collect the rent, and how the petitioner is to spend the collected rents. The contract also provides that the petitioner is responsible for "using, and renewing annually, the DHS approved Tenant Lease." The contract also provides that the petitioner is responsible for evicting tenants "that cause serious infractions against the State and City Housing laws and regulations and the DHS approved Tenant Lease."
In September 2005, the petitioner commenced this proceeding to evict the tenant from the subject premises. The petitioner alleged that it was the landlord of the building in which the subject premises were located, a "multiple dwelling" not subject to rent stabilization because it was operated exclusively for charitable purposes on a not-for-profit basis. The petitioner also alleged that the tenant entered into possession of the subject premises pursuant to an oral lease agreement, and remained in possession after the expiration of that agreement as a month-to-month tenant. The petitioner did not allege that the building was owned by the City, the existence of the contract between the DHS and the petitioner, or a cause for eviction other than the expiration of the tenancy.
The tenant's attorney was unaware of the existence of the contract between the DHS and the petitioner until the instant litigation was well underway. Upon learning of that contract, the tenant's attorney objected to the sufficiency of the petition. However, after a nonjury trial, the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, determining, among other things, that the petition was sufficient, awarded the petitioner a final judgment of possession....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
125 Court St., LLC v. Nicholson
...of Am.-Greater NY, Inc. v. Almonte , 17 Misc. 3d 57, 847 N.Y.S.2d 327 [App. Term, 2d Dept. 2d & 11th Jud. Dists 2007], affd 65 A.D.3d 1155, 886 N.Y.S.2d 46 [2009] ).Landlord's argument that the June 14, 2011 letter was not new or that it would not have changed the prior determination is una......
-
E. 168th St. Assocs. v. Castillo
...; Villas of Forest Hills Co. v Lumberger , 128 A.D.2d 701, 513 N.Y.S.2d 116 [2nd Dept. 1987] ; Matter of Volunteers of America v. Almonte , 65 A.D.3d 1155, 886 N.Y.S.2d 46 [2d Dep't 2009) ].) The fourth affirmative defense, that Petitioner improperly terminated Respondents Section 8 subsidy......
-
Metro Plaza Apartments, Inc. v. Buchanan
...204 A.D.3d 45162 N.Y.S.3d 543In the Matter of METRO PLAZA APARTMENTS, INC., Respondent,v.Vicki ... Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.Calendar Date: January 11, 2022Decided and Entered: ... City Housing Auth., 425 F.2d at 862 ; Matter of Volunteers of Am.-Greater N. Y., Inc. v. Almonte, 65 A.D.3d 1155, ... ...
-
2110 Arthur Assets LLC v. Vista Mgmt. Corp.
...in Support at § 57. Respondent cites to an Appellate Division, Second Department case, Volunteers of America–Greater New York, Inc v. Almonte(65 AD3d 1155, 886 N.Y.S.2d 46 [2nd Dep't 2009] ), which upheld the Appellate Term's reversal of the lower court's post-trial issuance of a judgment o......