MATTINGLY v. State of Fla., 5D09-2572.
| Decision Date | 06 August 2010 |
| Docket Number | No. 5D09-2572.,5D09-2572. |
| Parties | Stephen Jeffrey MATTINGLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Thomas J. Lukashow, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
Stephen Mattingly ["Appellant"] entered a nolo contendere plea to possession of methamphetamine and driving while license suspended or revoked, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because he was not driving on a street or highway as defined by Florida Statutes when he was stopped for driving with a suspended license. Because the evidence supports the trial court's factual determination that the road is open to the public, we affirm.
At the hearing on Appellant's motion to suppress, Deputy Eugene Harper testified that, on January 29, 2009, he observed Appellant drive his car from the rear of his property onto a dirt road called 205th, and then start driving toward another dirt road called 140th. Deputy Harper knew that Appellant's driver's license was suspended. After Deputy Harper confirmed that Appellant was the person driving the car, he attempted a traffic stop, but Appellant did not stop. Instead, he continued driving until he was back at his own house. When Appellant got out of his car, a packet containing illegal drugs fell to the ground.
Deputy Harper testified that, although the roads were privately owned, he would describe them as public access roads. The roads do not have any stop signs or street lights, but one of the roads nearby has a bar that is open to the public. Deputy Harper testified that the roads on which Appellant was driving have no signs or other devices that would label the roads as private property or otherwise restrict access.
Appellant presented the testimony of Mike McCain, the asset manager for the Marion County Transportation Department, who testified that the county did not maintain the roads in the area known as the Big Scrub Campsite where Deputy Harper observed Appellant driving. At the conclusion of the hearing, Appellant argued that, because the dirt roads in the Big Scrub area were private roads that were not maintained by the county, it was not illegal for him to drive on those roads without...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Gardner
...Ct. App. 1994). Whether a street is considered open to public use by vehicles is usually a question of fact. Mattingly v. State, 41 So. 3d 1020, 1022 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010). First, the district court did not clearly err in finding that Deputy Carroll observed Gardner driving in the comp......
-
MID-Fla. FREEZER WAREHOUSES v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS Comm'n
...context of administrative proceedings, but are not eliminated entirely. Id. Here, the employer made no effort to satisfy the requirements 41 So.3d 1020 of section 90.803(6). Indeed, the employer never sought to introduce the documentary evidence at the hearing under the business records exc......
-
Angelotta v. Sec. Nat'l Ins., Case No. 5D12-3363
...for purposes of vehicular traffic.§ 316.003(53)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007); see also § 322.01(38), Fla. Stat. (2007); Mattingly v. State, 41 So. 3d 1020, 1021-22 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). ...
-
Angelotta v. Sec. Nat'l Ins., Co.
...for purposes of vehicular traffic. § 316.003(53)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007); see also§ 322.01(38), Fla. Stat. (2007); Mattingly v. State, 41 So.3d 1020, 1021–22 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). ...
-
Crimes
...definition if the street is open to public use. Whether a private road is open to public use is a question of fact. Mattingly v. State, 41 So. 3d 1020 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) Offenses under §322.34(1), driving with license suspended without knowledge, cannot be used to enhance a subsequent char......