Maucher v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company
Decision Date | 22 September 1916 |
Docket Number | 18721 |
Citation | 159 N.W. 422,100 Neb. 237 |
Parties | JOSEPH MAUCHER, APPELLEE, v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, APPELLANT |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
APPEAL from the district court for Douglas county: ALEXANDER C TROUP, JUDGE. Affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
W. D McHugh, W. H. Herdman and John M. Kelley, for appellant.
Mahoney & Kennedy, contra.
Plaintiff brought this action against defendant to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained in a rear-end collision on defendant's line of railroad August 12, 1913. There was a verdict for $ 12,500, which on motion for a new trial was reduced to $ 10,000, and defendant has appealed.
Defendant was, and is, a railroad company engaged in general railroad business, both intrastate and interstate. At the date of the injury plaintiff was an employee of a circus company known as "Barnum and Bailey Shows," but owned by Ringling Brothers, a copartnership. The day preceding the injury the circus company gave a performance in the city of Lincoln, Nebraska, and on the evening of that day loaded its cars with its circus equipment, baggage, and paraphernalia, and its employees. The cars belonging to the circus company were attached to a locomotive engine and way-car belonging to defendant. The engine crew and train crew were made up of the regular employees of defendant. As thus made up, this circus train started for Atlantic, Iowa, where the circus company was to give an exhibition the following day. The train passed eastward over defendant's tracks and passed South Bend, an open telegraph station. Richfield, about twelve miles farther east, was the next open telegraph station, and the stretch of track between these two stations constituted a "block." Shortly after the circus train left South Bend one of defendant's regular passenger trains arrived at that station, and received a "block" restriction card, which required the engineer to proceed at no greater speed than would permit a complete stop at any time within the range of track which was open to his vision. This "block" has a number of cuts and curves. The engineer failed to obey the restriction order and, as a consequence, ran his engine into the rear end of the circus train as it pulled onto a sidetrack at Richfield. As a result of this collision plaintiff received severe and perhaps permanent injuries.
There is practically no dispute as to the facts, but defendant denies liability, relying upon certain contracts set out at length in the pleadings. One of these is a contract between the circus company and defendant, whereby defendant undertook to transport the property of the circus company, consisting of its cars and other equipment, from point to point along its line of road, including the transportation from Lincoln, Nebraska, to Atlantic, Iowa, on special time schedules and at reduced rates. The employees of the circus company were to be conveyed in the cars of the circus company in the same train with the baggage, paraphernalia, and other equipment. This transportation was to be made by defendant furnishing to and for the use of the circus company the necessary locomotives, the fuel therefor, the engine and train crews and other necessary employees, and granting the right to use defendant's tracks. Among other stipulations contained were the following:
This contract was made in the state of Illinois, and is claimed to be valid under the laws of that state.
At the time of the injury plaintiff was an employee of the circus company, and, as such employee, was riding on this circus train without having paid, offered to pay, or intending to pay, any transportation whatever, and his right to be thereon was due to his employment, under a contract which he had with the circus company. The train was being moved and operated over the track of defendant in pursuance of the contract heretofore partially set out.
Before entering the employment of the circus company, to wit, June 9, 1913, plaintiff had entered into a contract in writing with the circus company, containing the following stipulations: "Now, therefore, for valuable consideration, and in consideration of this employment, and the furnishing by first party to second party of transportation and board of the kind customary and usual in the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Curcio
... ... Little Rock on October 7, 1922, for a week's engagement ... The ... cars or railway equipment, or ... [261 S.W. 898] ... to baggage or ... ...
- Maucher v. Chi., R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
- Boon v. Brockway's Estate (In re Brockway's Estate)
- In re Estate of Brockway