Mawardi v. Purple Potato, Ltd.
| Decision Date | 16 November 1992 |
| Citation | 590 N.Y.S.2d 132,187 A.D.2d 569 |
| Parties | Aliza MAWARDI, Respondent, v. PURPLE POTATO, LTD., et al., Appellants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Castro & Karten, New York City (Claude Castro, of counsel), for appellants.
Solomon E. Antar, New York City, for respondent.
Before THOMPSON, J.P., and EIBER, COPERTINO and PIZZUTO, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action, inter alia, to permanently enjoin the defendants from repairing fire damage to the premises located at 487 Kings Highway, in Brooklyn, and for a judgment declaring that the lease between the parties is terminated, the defendants Purple Potato, Ltd., and Daniel S. Cohen appeal from an order and judgment (one paper), of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), entered August 17, 1990, which, after a hearing, is in favor of the plaintiff, declaring the lease terminated and permanently enjoining the defendants from entering or repairing the subject premises.
ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff is the owner of a building containing four retail establishments. One of the stores was occupied by the appellants' restaurant. On March 28, 1990, a fire occurred at the building, forcing the restaurant and two adjoining stores to close down. The plaintiff sent a notice to the appellants terminating their tenancy pursuant to paragraph 9(d) of the lease, which provides that the landlord may terminate the lease if the premises are wholly unusable or if the building is so damaged that the owner decides to demolish or rebuild it. The appellants, however, began to repair the premises at their own cost in order to reopen the business. The plaintiff commenced this action and obtained a preliminary injunction, enjoining the appellants from continuing repairs to the premises. The Supreme Court, after a hearing, granted the plaintiff's application for a permanent injunction and a declaratory judgment, finding the premises unusable and the plaintiff's decision to demolish reasonable and in good faith. We agree.
The evidence showed that as a result of the fire, the sheetrock ceiling and walls had been removed from the premises, and a skylight had been removed, which opened the restaurant to the elements and caused water damage. It was estimated that repairs to the restaurant would cost approximately $20,000 and take a minimum of a week. Repairs to all the damaged stores would cost about $75,000 to $100,000. This evidence was sufficient to find that the restaurant was unusable in its present condition (see, Old Line Co. v. Getty Square...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Las Palmeras De Ossining Rest., Inc. v. Midway Ctr. Corp.
...828–829, 322 N.Y.S.2d 149;cf. Adams Drug Co. v. Knobel, 64 N.Y.2d 768–770, 485 N.Y.S.2d 983, 475 N.E.2d 450;Mawardi v. Purple Potato, 187 A.D.2d 569, 569–570, 590 N.Y.S.2d 132). Consequently, the Supreme Court should have granted the defendant's cross motion. The court properly concluded, h......
-
Barrow v. Lenox Terrace Dev. Associates
...(2), since the record establishes that the fire damage was so extensive as to satisfy all three bases ( see Mawardi v. Purple Potato, Ltd., 187 A.D.2d 569, 590 N.Y.S.2d 132 [1992] ). As a result of the fire, most of the roof caved in, causing the sky to be clearly visible from inside the pr......
-
Pig Restaurant, Inc. v. Odelia Enterprises Corp.
...to Article 9(d) thereof after the demised premises were "rendered wholly unusable" as the result of a fire (see, Mawardi v. Purple Potato, 187 A.D.2d 569, 590 N.Y.S.2d 132). Since the lease provision was written in the disjunctive, there was no need for defendant to indicate whether it inte......
- Lorber v. Barry A. Glasser & Co., Inc.